MVALvsOAKMETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. MVAL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, OAKM's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. MVAL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.09%, versus 0.64% for OAKM. MVAL is up 8.28% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. OAKM performs better with 9.48% YTD performance, and +$149M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MVAL and OAKM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MVAL vs OAKM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MVAL OAKM | +5.34%+3.60% | +6.33%+7.17% | +8.28%+9.48% | +11.83%+15.42% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | MVAL OAKM | -+$31M | +$1K+$29M | -$3M+$149M | -$3M+$305M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MVAL OAKM | +14.78%+13.13% | +14.12%+13.36% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MVAL OAKM | -9.78%-8.63% | -12.10%-8.63% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MVAL OAKM | 60d50d | 169d50d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
MVAL | OAKM | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.21 | $31.02 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $39.65 | $31.27 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OAKM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMVAL | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MVAL | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.21 | $31.02 |
| 1D performance | -1.12% | -0.80% |
| AuM | $1.96 M | $1.19 B |
| E/R | 2.09% | 0.64% |
Characteristics
MVAL | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | VanEck | Oakmark Funds |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index (MSUBVFGU) | - |
| N° of holdings | 45 | 38 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 26, 2024 | December 2, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MVAL
USA
94.11%
Other
5.89%
OAKM
USA
91.68%
Other
8.32%
Sectors
MVAL
Consumer Non-Cycl.
31.86%
Healthcare
24.42%
Finance
12.35%
Technology
9.04%
Other
22.33%
OAKM
Finance
38.78%
Healthcare
13.62%
Technology
13.61%
Other
33.98%
Diversification
MVAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.44%
OAKM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
51.39%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MVAL
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
4.75%
Danaher Corp.
4.55%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
4.51%
Kenvue, Inc.
4.31%
Brown-Forman Corp.
4.20%
The Clorox Co.
3.81%
Constellation Brands, Inc.
3.67%
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc.
3.65%
Microsoft Corp.
3.26%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
2.80%
Otis Worldwide Corp.
2.61%
NIKE, Inc.
2.61%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
2.60%
Masco Corp.
2.60%
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
2.54%
OAKM
Salesforce, Inc.
4.41%
Airbnb, Inc.
3.99%
Targa Resources Corp.
3.66%
Willis Towers Watson Plc
3.57%
Citigroup, Inc.
3.46%
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
3.44%
Merck & Co., Inc.
3.41%
Capital One Financial Corp.
3.36%
State Street Corp.
3.36%
Bank of America Corp.
3.29%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.26%
Corteva, Inc.
3.11%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
3.08%
Elevance Health, Inc.
3.00%
ConocoPhillips
2.99%
Frequently asked questions about MVAL and OAKM
How have the MVAL and OAKM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, MVAL is up 8.28% year-to-date (YTD), while OAKM has returned 9.48%. That puts OAKM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MVAL or OAKM?
Year-to-date, the MVAL ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$149M for OAKM.
Which ETF is more volatile: MVAL or OAKM?
Over the past year, MVAL had a volatility of 14.12%, while OAKM experienced 13.36%.
Which ETF is bigger: MVAL or OAKM?
As of October 23, 2026, MVAL holds $1.96 M in assets under management (AUM), while OAKM manages $1.19 B.
What sectors do the MVAL and OAKM ETFs invest in?
MVAL leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, OAKM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the MVAL ETF and OAKM ETF?
MVAL top holdings include Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Danaher Corp. and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.. OAKM holds in its top three: Salesforce, Inc., Airbnb, Inc. and Targa Resources Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MVAL or OAKM?
MVAL holds 45 securities with 52.44% of its assets in the top 15. OAKM has 39 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.39%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MVAL & OAKM
Advertisement
Advertisement
