MVALvsCOWZETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is part of the US Large Cap segment. MVAL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, COWZ's top sector exposures are Healthcare, Technology and Energy. MVAL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.09%, versus 0.49% for COWZ. MVAL is up 3.35% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. COWZ performs better with 16.32% YTD performance, and -$1.24B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MVAL and COWZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MVAL vs COWZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MVAL COWZ | -5.00%-0.53% | +4.23%+10.51% | +3.35%+16.32% | +11.13%+23.31% | n/a+45.42% | n/a+73.95% |
| Flows | MVAL COWZ | -+$36M | +$3K-$223M | -$3M-$1.24B | -$3M-$3.64B | --$1.24B | -+$12.01B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MVAL COWZ | +15.55%+15.36% | +14.12%+12.26% | n/a+15.10% | n/a+17.71% |
| Max drawdown | MVAL COWZ | -6.98%-4.13% | -12.10%-5.93% | n/a-21.93% | n/a-21.93% |
| Max drawdown duration | MVAL COWZ | 17d7d | 169d53d | n/a373d | n/a373d |
Trading data
MVAL | COWZ | |
Last sale 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.40 | $69.24 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $37.65 | $69.50 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MVAL | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MVAL | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.40 | $69.24 |
| 1D performance | -0.67% | -0.37% |
| AuM | $1.87 M | $19.39 B |
| E/R | 2.09% | 0.49% |
Characteristics
MVAL | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index (MSUBVFGU) | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 45 | 98 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 26, 2024 | December 16, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
MVAL
USA
94.07%
Other
5.93%
COWZ
USA
96.75%
Other
3.25%
Sectors
MVAL
Consumer Non-Cycl.
32.51%
Healthcare
23.81%
Finance
12.08%
Technology
9.13%
Other
22.47%
COWZ
Healthcare
19.94%
Technology
19.1%
Energy
11.82%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.36%
Industrials
9.55%
Telecommunication.
7.69%
Other
21.54%
Diversification
MVAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.18%
COWZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.86%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
MVAL
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
4.78%
Brown-Forman Corp.
4.68%
Kenvue, Inc.
4.54%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
4.37%
Danaher Corp.
4.28%
The Clorox Co.
3.84%
Constellation Brands, Inc.
3.76%
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc.
3.59%
Microsoft Corp.
3.06%
NIKE, Inc.
2.88%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
2.77%
Otis Worldwide Corp.
2.72%
U.S. Bancorp
2.66%
Masco Corp.
2.65%
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
2.61%
COWZ
Booking Holdings, Inc.
2.22%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
2.18%
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
2.06%
General Dynamics Corp.
2.05%
Intuit, Inc.
2.04%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
1.97%
AT&T, Inc.
1.95%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
1.93%
Comcast Corp.
1.92%
Salesforce, Inc.
1.90%
Adobe, Inc.
1.90%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
1.90%
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
1.89%
Ford Motor Co.
1.88%
Frequently asked questions about MVAL and COWZ
How have the MVAL and COWZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, MVAL is up 3.35% year-to-date (YTD), while COWZ has returned 16.32%. That puts COWZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MVAL or COWZ?
Year-to-date, the MVAL ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$1.24B for COWZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: MVAL or COWZ?
Over the past year, MVAL had a volatility of 14.12%, while COWZ experienced 12.26%.
Which ETF is bigger: MVAL or COWZ?
As of September 10, 2026, MVAL holds $1.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while COWZ manages $19.39 B.
What sectors do the MVAL and COWZ ETFs invest in?
MVAL leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, COWZ focuses on Healthcare, Technology and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the MVAL ETF and COWZ ETF?
MVAL top holdings include Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Brown-Forman Corp. and Kenvue, Inc.. COWZ holds in its top three: Booking Holdings, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Co. and HCA Healthcare, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: MVAL or COWZ?
MVAL holds 45 securities with 53.18% of its assets in the top 15. COWZ has 98 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.86%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MVAL & COWZ
Hiding in Plain Sight: The Case for 'Unloved' Dividend Payers in ETFs
March 24, 2025
COWZ
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
October 10, 2024
COWZ
Recap of the Most Interesting Recent ETF Filings For the NYSE
June 29, 2023
COWZ
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
April 28, 2023
COWZ
Advertisement
Advertisement
