MSTQvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.81%
LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. MSTQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.59%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. MSTQ is up 12.31% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. QDPL performs worse with 12.06% YTD performance, and +$300M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MSTQ and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MSTQ vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MSTQ QDPL | +1.53%+1.34% | +1.38%+1.65% | +12.31%+12.06% | +11.07%+15.84% | +78.20%+73.85% | n/a+75.18% |
| Flows | MSTQ QDPL | -+$35M | +$2M+$119M | +$6M+$300M | +$9M+$420M | +$26M+$1.37B | -+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MSTQ QDPL | +19.69%+10.24% | +18.51%+11.68% | +17.80%+13.54% | n/a+15.34% |
| Max drawdown | MSTQ QDPL | -7.06%-2.82% | -12.32%-8.32% | -15.38%-17.47% | n/a-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | MSTQ QDPL | 13d53d | 121d70d | 148d126d | n/a704d |
Trading data
MSTQ | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.01 | $46.01 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $38.72 | $45.95 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MSTQ
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMSTQ | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MSTQ | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.01 | $46.01 |
| 1D performance | +0.75% | +0.13% |
| AuM | $39.61 M | $1.83 B |
| E/R | 1.59% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
MSTQ | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Little Harbor Advisor | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 15, 2022 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MSTQ
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
MSTQ
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
MSTQ
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
MSTQ
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about MSTQ and QDPL
How have the MSTQ and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, MSTQ is up 12.31% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 12.06%. That puts MSTQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MSTQ or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the MSTQ ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$300M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: MSTQ or QDPL?
Over the past year, MSTQ had a volatility of 18.51%, while QDPL experienced 11.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: MSTQ or QDPL?
As of October 16, 2026, MSTQ holds $39.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.83 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about MSTQ & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
