MSTBvsCSHIETF Comparison
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. MSTB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.4%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. MSTB is up 10.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. CSHI performs worse with 3.83% YTD performance, and +$1.23B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MSTB and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MSTB vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MSTB CSHI | -0.82%+0.36% | +3.59%+1.06% | +10.64%+3.83% | +10.17%+4.97% | +71.35%+16.74% | +47.72%n/a |
| Flows | MSTB CSHI | +$1M+$186M | +$23K+$570M | +$2M+$1.23B | -$4M+$1.36B | +$7M+$1.84B | -$66M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MSTB CSHI | +11.56%+0.23% | +11.27%+0.53% | +12.49%+1.10% | +14.06%n/a |
| Max drawdown | MSTB CSHI | -3.41%n/a | -8.00%-0.18% | -10.74%-1.52% | -25.40%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MSTB CSHI | 53dn/a | 168d6d | 106d20d | 889dn/a |
MSTB | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.10 | $49.61 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $44.04 | $49.59 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
MSTB | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.10 | $49.61 |
| 1D performance | +0.15% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $199.60 M | $2.03 B |
| E/R | 1.4% | 0.38% |
MSTB | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Little Harbor Advisor | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 30, 2020 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
