MSMRvsCSHIETF Comparison
VS
McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. MSMR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.06%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. MSMR is up 3.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$26M in YTD flows. CSHI performs better with 3.94% YTD performance, and +$1.28B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MSMR and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MSMR vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MSMR CSHI | +1.32%+0.37% | +1.24%+1.10% | +3.28%+3.94% | +3.61%+4.88% | +54.93%+16.77% | n/an/a |
| Flows | MSMR CSHI | -$2M+$212M | -$3M+$575M | +$26M+$1.28B | +$32M+$1.41B | +$109M+$1.89B | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MSMR CSHI | +8.74%+0.22% | +11.46%+0.52% | +10.62%+1.10% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MSMR CSHI | -3.94%n/a | -9.18%-0.18% | -9.18%-1.52% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MSMR CSHI | 71dn/a | 141d6d | 141d20d | n/an/a |
Trading data
MSMR | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.95 | $49.66 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $34.91 | $49.65 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MSMR | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.95 | $49.66 |
| 1D performance | +0.11% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $181.53 M | $2.09 B |
| E/R | 1.06% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
MSMR | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | APTUS ETFs | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 16, 2021 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MSMR
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
MSMR
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
MSMR
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
MSMR
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about MSMR and CSHI
How have the MSMR and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, MSMR is up 3.28% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 3.94%. That puts CSHI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MSMR or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the MSMR ETF saw +$26M in flows, compared to +$1.28B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: MSMR or CSHI?
Over the past year, MSMR had a volatility of 11.46%, while CSHI experienced 0.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: MSMR or CSHI?
As of October 23, 2026, MSMR holds $181.53 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.09 B.
Latest news about MSMR & CSHI
Advertisement
Advertisement
