MRSKvsGPIQETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. MRSK is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.05%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. MRSK is up 8.95% year-to-date (YTD) with -$26M in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 17.22% YTD performance, and +$3.76B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MRSK and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MRSK vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MRSK GPIQ | +1.34%-0.88% | +3.81%+6.85% | +8.95%+17.22% | +9.69%+16.00% | +53.46%+96.45% | +43.19%n/a |
| Flows | MRSK GPIQ | -$1M+$616M | +$2M+$1.44B | -$26M+$3.76B | -$21M+$4.39B | +$136M+$6.17B | +$235M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MRSK GPIQ | +9.02%+15.90% | +10.31%+17.29% | +10.05%+17.93% | +10.84%n/a |
| Max drawdown | MRSK GPIQ | -3.02%-5.87% | -7.35%-9.57% | -10.73%-21.18% | -14.17%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MRSK GPIQ | 53d22d | 65d75d | 218d124d | 562dn/a |
MRSK | GPIQ | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.97 | $56.80 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $39.81 | $56.49 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
MRSK | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.97 | $56.80 |
| 1D performance | +0.40% | +0.55% |
| AuM | $326.41 M | $6.58 B |
| E/R | 1.05% | 0.35% |
MRSK | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Agility Shares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2020 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
