Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MOOvsREMXETF Comparison
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MOO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. In contrast, REMX's top sector exposures are Materials, MOO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.58% for REMX. MOO is up 15.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$299M in YTD flows. REMX performs better with 31.47% YTD performance, and +$786M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOO and REMX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MOO vs REMX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOO REMX | -2.06%+6.37% | +15.35%+32.65% | +15.03%+31.47% | +25.31%+139.90% | +7.87%+29.69% | +6.97%+36.47% |
| Flows | MOO REMX | +$44M+$183M | +$295M+$881M | +$299M+$786M | +$266M+$1.79B | -$224M+$1.71B | +$91M+$1.67B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOO REMX | +13.81%+44.73% | +15.71%+39.35% | +14.91%+33.20% | +16.35%+34.83% |
| Max drawdown | MOO REMX | -4.90%-15.34% | -12.71%-24.86% | -26.51%-61.47% | -39.01%-72.86% |
| Max drawdown duration | MOO REMX | 20d30d | 43d112d | 1015d908d | 1421d1437d |
MOO | REMX | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $84.79 | $93.76 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $83.78 | $96.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MOO | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MOO | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $84.79 | $93.76 |
| 1D performance | +1.21% | -3.27% |
| AuM | $970.45 M | $2.96 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.58% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MOO and REMX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MOO is up 15.03% year-to-date (YTD), while REMX has returned 31.47%. That puts REMX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or REMX?
Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$299M in flows, compared to +$786M for REMX.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or REMX?
Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 15.71%, while REMX experienced 39.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOO or REMX?
As of March 11, 2026, MOO holds $970.45 M in assets under management (AUM), while REMX manages $2.96 B.
What sectors do the MOO and REMX ETFs invest in?
MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, REMX focuses on Materials.
What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and REMX ETF?
MOO top holdings include DEERE, BAYER AG and ZOETIS INC. REMX holds in its top three: ALBEMARLE, RARE-EARTH and XIAMEN TUNGST.
Which ETF is more diversified: MOO or REMX?
MOO holds 47 securities with 70.5% of its assets in the top 15. REMX has 24 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.5%.
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
