MOOvsREMXETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MOO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. In contrast, REMX's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Utilities. MOO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.58% for REMX. MOO is up 14.96% year-to-date (YTD) with +$332M in YTD flows. REMX performs worse with -9.73% YTD performance, and +$736M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOO and REMX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MOO vs REMX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOO REMX | +5.72%-23.24% | +1.82%-32.30% | +14.96%-9.73% | +15.75%+26.59% | +4.52%-14.84% | +2.94%-26.84% |
| Flows | MOO REMX | +$24M-$92M | -$161M+$89M | +$332M+$736M | +$277M+$1.54B | -$54M+$1.68B | +$134M+$1.60B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOO REMX | +13.52%+41.69% | +13.38%+42.52% | +14.59%+35.36% | +16.46%+35.70% |
| Max drawdown | MOO REMX | -9.34%-38.57% | -10.98%-38.57% | -26.29%-58.40% | -39.01%-72.86% |
| Max drawdown duration | MOO REMX | 84d83d | 159d83d | 910d886d | 1560d1576d |
Trading data
MOO | REMX | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $83.39 | $64.59 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $83.88 | $66.09 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MOO | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MOO | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $83.39 | $64.59 |
| 1D performance | -0.58% | -2.27% |
| AuM | $999.13 M | $1.95 B |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.58% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MOO
USA
52.47%
Germany
9.66%
Other
37.87%
REMX
China
35.01%
Australia
24.14%
USA
21.41%
Other
19.44%
Sectors
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
33.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
27.89%
Industrials
22.41%
Healthcare
16.13%
Other
0%
REMX
Non-Energy Materi.
91.72%
Other
8.28%
Advertisement
Diversification
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.43%
REMX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.99%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
MOO
Bayer AG
8.82%
Deere & Co.
8.78%
Corteva, Inc.
8.78%
Nutrien Ltd.
5.99%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.30%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.10%
Kubota Corp.
4.76%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
4.46%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.25%
Bunge Global SA
3.44%
Mowi ASA
2.84%
CNH Industrial NV
2.61%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.49%
The Toro Co.
2.45%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.37%
REMX
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
7.03%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.
6.93%
Albemarle Corp.
6.91%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
6.84%
PLS Group Ltd.
6.79%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co., Ltd.
6.14%
MP Materials Corp.
6.02%
TW0007610B14
4.69%
Almonty Industries, Inc.
4.65%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
4.61%
Shenghe Resources Holding Co., Ltd.
4.09%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
3.87%
Liontown Ltd.
3.78%
Sanxiang Advanced Materials Co., Ltd
3.32%
Iluka Resources Ltd.
3.31%
Frequently asked questions about MOO and REMX
How have the MOO and REMX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, MOO is up 14.96% year-to-date (YTD), while REMX has lost -9.73%. That puts MOO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or REMX?
Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$332M in flows, compared to +$736M for REMX.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or REMX?
Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 13.38%, while REMX experienced 42.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOO or REMX?
As of July 28, 2026, MOO holds $999.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while REMX manages $1.95 B.
What sectors do the MOO and REMX ETFs invest in?
MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, REMX focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and REMX ETF?
MOO top holdings include Bayer AG, Deere & Co. and Corteva, Inc.. REMX holds in its top three: Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd., China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd. and Albemarle Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MOO or REMX?
MOO holds 46 securities with 72.43% of its assets in the top 15. REMX has 29 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.99%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MOO & REMX
There's an ETF for That? Emerging Markets Without China
June 25, 2026
REMX
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
REMX
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
October 30, 2025
REMX
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
REMX
Advertisement
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
December 18, 2023
MOO
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
December 18, 2023
MOO
Advertisement
