MOOvsNANRETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
NANR
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
+0.48%
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MOO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. In contrast, NANR's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. MOO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.35% for NANR. MOO is up 12.44% year-to-date (YTD) with +$476M in YTD flows. NANR performs better with 29.58% YTD performance, and -$135M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOO and NANR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MOO vs NANR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOO NANR | -3.23%+0.33% | -0.99%+8.27% | +12.44%+29.58% | +13.44%+37.82% | +22.23%+78.02% | -3.90%+119.16% |
| Flows | MOO NANR | -$94M+$11M | +$148M+$21M | +$476M-$135M | +$455M-$139M | +$134M-$84M | +$292M-$94M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOO NANR | +13.42%+16.84% | +13.92%+19.10% | +14.53%+19.31% | +16.50%+22.05% |
| Max drawdown | MOO NANR | -9.40%-7.91% | -10.98%-12.16% | -17.98%-18.22% | -39.01%-26.26% |
| Max drawdown duration | MOO NANR | 51d44d | 193d161d | 531d200d | 1647d759d |
Trading data
MOO | NANR | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.24 | $87.71 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $81.69 | $87.27 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MOO | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MOO | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.24 | $87.71 |
| 1D performance | -0.55% | +0.50% |
| AuM | $1.11 B | $834.64 M |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
MOO | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index | S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index |
| N° of holdings | 46 | 209 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2007 | December 15, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MOO
USA
50.98%
Germany
9.84%
Norway
7.56%
Other
31.62%
NANR
USA
58.64%
Canada
27.91%
Other
13.45%
Sectors
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
34.08%
Non-Energy Materi.
28.69%
Industrials
21.21%
Healthcare
16.02%
Other
0%
NANR
Non-Energy Materi.
48.05%
Energy
35.57%
Other
16.38%
Advertisement
Diversification
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.06%
NANR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MOO
Bayer AG
8.83%
Corteva, Inc.
8.24%
Deere & Co.
8.24%
Nutrien Ltd.
6.72%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.22%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.05%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.74%
Kubota Corp.
4.62%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
3.93%
Bunge Global SA
3.40%
Mowi ASA
3.08%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.68%
CNH Industrial NV
2.49%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.45%
Yara International ASA
2.39%
NANR
Chevron Corp.
6.81%
Newmont Corp.
3.97%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
3.21%
Corteva, Inc.
3.13%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
3.04%
ConocoPhillips
2.85%
Barrick Mining Corp.
2.22%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
2.17%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
2.02%
Nutrien Ltd.
2.01%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.92%
Valero Energy Corp.
1.88%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
1.84%
Phillips 66
1.74%
Nucor Corp.
1.68%
Frequently asked questions about MOO and NANR
How have the MOO and NANR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, MOO is up 12.44% year-to-date (YTD), while NANR has returned 29.58%. That puts NANR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or NANR?
Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$476M in flows, compared to -$135M for NANR.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or NANR?
Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 13.92%, while NANR experienced 19.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOO or NANR?
As of October 23, 2026, MOO holds $1.11 B in assets under management (AUM), while NANR manages $834.64 M.
What sectors do the MOO and NANR ETFs invest in?
MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, NANR focuses on Non-Energy Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and NANR ETF?
MOO top holdings include Bayer AG, Corteva, Inc. and Deere & Co.. NANR holds in its top three: Chevron Corp., Newmont Corp. and Freeport-McMoRan, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: MOO or NANR?
MOO holds 46 securities with 72.06% of its assets in the top 15. NANR has 209 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.51%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MOO & NANR
Advertisement
