Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MOOvsNANRETF Comparison
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MOO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. In contrast, NANR's top sector exposures are Energy, Materials and Consumer Staples. MOO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.35% for NANR. MOO is up 15.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$299M in YTD flows. NANR performs better with 22.05% YTD performance, and -$132M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOO and NANR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MOO vs NANR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOO NANR | -2.06%-0.16% | +15.35%+21.38% | +15.03%+22.05% | +25.31%+60.73% | +7.87%+72.91% | +6.97%+130.88% |
| Flows | MOO NANR | +$44M-$124M | +$295M-$132M | +$299M-$132M | +$266M-$132M | -$224M-$284M | +$91M-$133M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOO NANR | +13.81%+23.15% | +15.71%+22.47% | +14.91%+19.61% | +16.35%+22.60% |
| Max drawdown | MOO NANR | -4.90%-5.12% | -12.71%-16.16% | -26.51%-18.22% | -39.01%-26.26% |
| Max drawdown duration | MOO NANR | 20d9d | 43d65d | 1015d200d | 1421d759d |
MOO | NANR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $84.79 | $82.71 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $83.78 | $82.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MOO | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MOO | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $84.79 | $82.71 |
| 1D performance | +1.21% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $970.45 M | $797.08 M |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MOO and NANR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MOO is up 15.03% year-to-date (YTD), while NANR has returned 22.05%. That puts NANR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or NANR?
Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$299M in flows, compared to -$132M for NANR.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or NANR?
Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 15.71%, while NANR experienced 22.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOO or NANR?
As of March 11, 2026, MOO holds $970.45 M in assets under management (AUM), while NANR manages $797.08 M.
What sectors do the MOO and NANR ETFs invest in?
MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, NANR focuses on Energy and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and NANR ETF?
MOO top holdings include DEERE, BAYER AG and ZOETIS INC. NANR holds in its top three: EXXON, CHEVRON TEXACO and NEWMONT CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: MOO or NANR?
MOO holds 47 securities with 70.5% of its assets in the top 15. NANR has 182 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.68%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
