MOOvsMGNRETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MOO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. In contrast, MGNR's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. MOO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.75% for MGNR. MOO is up 20.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$458M in YTD flows. MGNR performs better with 27.07% YTD performance, and +$824M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOO and MGNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MOO vs MGNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/09/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOO MGNR | +7.58%+5.38% | +12.48%+8.47% | +20.68%+27.07% | +20.95%+50.39% | +16.68%n/a | +7.26%n/a |
| Flows | MOO MGNR | +$111M+$356M | +$139M+$410M | +$458M+$824M | +$422M+$940M | +$89M- | +$279M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOO MGNR | +13.28%+21.38% | +13.64%+24.10% | +14.67%n/a | +16.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown | MOO MGNR | -3.05%-9.43% | -10.98%-15.40% | -22.31%n/a | -39.01%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MOO MGNR | 23d54d | 193d99d | 852dn/a | 1603dn/a |
Trading data
MOO | MGNR | |
Last sale 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $86.79 | $54.39 |
| Previous close 09/09/2026 | $87.69 | $55.72 |
| Consolidated volume 09/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MGNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMOO | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MOO | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $86.79 | $54.39 |
| 1D performance | -1.03% | -2.39% |
| AuM | $1.18 B | $1.32 B |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
MOO | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | VanEck | American Beacon |
| Benchmark | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 46 | 40 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2007 | February 6, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MOO
USA
51.57%
Germany
9.81%
Norway
7.29%
Other
31.34%
MGNR
USA
49.52%
Canada
27.08%
Other
23.4%
Sectors
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
34.03%
Non-Energy Materi.
29.09%
Industrials
20.65%
Healthcare
16.24%
MGNR
Non-Energy Materi.
54.73%
Energy
26.22%
Industrials
8.24%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.2%
Other
2.6%
Advertisement
Diversification
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.49%
MGNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.86%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
MOO
Corteva, Inc.
8.92%
Bayer AG
8.89%
Deere & Co.
7.95%
Nutrien Ltd.
6.57%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.21%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.07%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.81%
Kubota Corp.
4.77%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
4.37%
Bunge Global SA
3.14%
Mowi ASA
3.01%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.58%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.57%
Yara International ASA
2.39%
CNH Industrial NV
2.24%
MGNR
ArcelorMittal SA
4.70%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
4.68%
Teck Resources Limited
4.41%
Smurfit WestRock Plc
4.40%
Range Resources Corp.
4.34%
Vista Energy SAB de CV
3.81%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
3.77%
Venture Global, Inc.
3.73%
Antero Resources Corp.
3.67%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
3.59%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
3.52%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
3.17%
Bunge Global SA
3.16%
EQT Corp.
3.02%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.90%
Frequently asked questions about MOO and MGNR
How have the MOO and MGNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 9, 2026, MOO is up 20.68% year-to-date (YTD), while MGNR has returned 27.07%. That puts MGNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or MGNR?
Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$458M in flows, compared to +$824M for MGNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or MGNR?
Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 13.64%, while MGNR experienced 24.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOO or MGNR?
As of September 9, 2026, MOO holds $1.18 B in assets under management (AUM), while MGNR manages $1.32 B.
What sectors do the MOO and MGNR ETFs invest in?
MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, MGNR focuses on Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and MGNR ETF?
MOO top holdings include Corteva, Inc., Bayer AG and Deere & Co.. MGNR holds in its top three: ArcelorMittal SA, Hudbay Minerals, Inc. and Teck Resources Limited.
Which ETF is more diversified: MOO or MGNR?
MOO holds 46 securities with 72.49% of its assets in the top 15. MGNR has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.86%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MOO & MGNR
Advertisement
