MOOvsMGNRETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MOO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. In contrast, MGNR's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. MOO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.75% for MGNR. MOO is up 12.44% year-to-date (YTD) with +$476M in YTD flows. MGNR performs worse with 7.44% YTD performance, and +$922M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOO and MGNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MOO vs MGNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOO MGNR | -3.23%-9.39% | -0.99%-5.09% | +12.44%+7.44% | +13.44%+17.09% | +22.23%n/a | -3.90%n/a |
| Flows | MOO MGNR | -$94M+$34M | +$148M+$433M | +$476M+$922M | +$455M+$976M | +$134M- | +$292M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOO MGNR | +13.42%+21.65% | +13.92%+23.83% | +14.53%n/a | +16.50%n/a |
| Max drawdown | MOO MGNR | -9.40%-16.16% | -10.98%-16.59% | -17.98%n/a | -39.01%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MOO MGNR | 51d59d | 193d143d | 531dn/a | 1647dn/a |
Trading data
MOO | MGNR | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.24 | $47.69 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $81.69 | $47.11 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MGNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMOO | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MOO | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.24 | $47.69 |
| 1D performance | -0.55% | +1.22% |
| AuM | $1.11 B | $1.21 B |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
MOO | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | VanEck | American Beacon |
| Benchmark | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 46 | 44 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2007 | February 6, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MOO
USA
50.98%
Germany
9.84%
Norway
7.56%
Other
31.62%
MGNR
USA
48.17%
Canada
28.99%
Other
22.84%
Sectors
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
34.08%
Non-Energy Materi.
28.69%
Industrials
21.21%
Healthcare
16.02%
Other
0%
MGNR
Non-Energy Materi.
59.73%
Energy
25.15%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.82%
Other
7.3%
Advertisement
Diversification
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.06%
MGNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.85%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MOO
Bayer AG
8.83%
Corteva, Inc.
8.24%
Deere & Co.
8.24%
Nutrien Ltd.
6.72%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.22%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.05%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.74%
Kubota Corp.
4.62%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
3.93%
Bunge Global SA
3.40%
Mowi ASA
3.08%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.68%
CNH Industrial NV
2.49%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.45%
Yara International ASA
2.39%
MGNR
ArcelorMittal SA
4.49%
Venture Global, Inc.
4.23%
Teck Resources Limited
4.14%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
4.07%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
4.03%
Smurfit WestRock Plc
4.03%
Range Resources Corp.
3.86%
Kinross Gold Corp.
3.82%
Equinox Gold Corp.
3.68%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
3.57%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
3.52%
Antero Resources Corp.
3.51%
Vista Energy SAB de CV
3.47%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
3.32%
Bunge Global SA
3.10%
Frequently asked questions about MOO and MGNR
How have the MOO and MGNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, MOO is up 12.44% year-to-date (YTD), while MGNR has returned 7.44%. That puts MOO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or MGNR?
Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$476M in flows, compared to +$922M for MGNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or MGNR?
Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 13.92%, while MGNR experienced 23.83%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOO or MGNR?
As of October 23, 2026, MOO holds $1.11 B in assets under management (AUM), while MGNR manages $1.21 B.
What sectors do the MOO and MGNR ETFs invest in?
MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, MGNR focuses on Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and MGNR ETF?
MOO top holdings include Bayer AG, Corteva, Inc. and Deere & Co.. MGNR holds in its top three: ArcelorMittal SA, Venture Global, Inc. and Teck Resources Limited.
Which ETF is more diversified: MOO or MGNR?
MOO holds 46 securities with 72.06% of its assets in the top 15. MGNR has 44 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.85%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MOO & MGNR
Advertisement
