MOOvsGNRETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
+0.19%
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MOO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. In contrast, GNR's top sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. MOO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.4% for GNR. MOO is up 7.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$319M in YTD flows. GNR performs better with 17.21% YTD performance, and +$352M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOO and GNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MOO vs GNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOO GNR | -3.63%-1.57% | -6.06%+0.34% | +7.73%+17.21% | +6.53%+34.24% | +3.39%+45.22% | -4.36%+57.23% |
| Flows | MOO GNR | -$8M+$90M | +$20M+$64M | +$319M+$352M | +$287M+$921M | -$88M+$440M | +$7M+$1.61B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOO GNR | +14.10%+14.00% | +13.42%+14.90% | +14.62%+15.25% | +16.46%+18.13% |
| Max drawdown | MOO GNR | -10.00%-6.18% | -10.08%-7.23% | -26.31%-19.80% | -39.01%-25.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | MOO GNR | 68d33d | 116d105d | 915d457d | 1517d758d |
Trading data
MOO | GNR | |
Last sale 6/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $77.98 | $71.98 |
| Previous close 06/15/2026 | $78.27 | $72.01 |
| Consolidated volume 06/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MOO | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MOO | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $77.98 | $71.98 |
| 1D performance | -0.37% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $924.54 M | $4.79 B |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
MOO | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index | S&P Global Natural Resources Index |
| N° of holdings | 46 | 76 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2007 | September 13, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MOO
USA
49.33%
Germany
8.52%
Norway
8.11%
Other
34.03%
GNR
USA
37.39%
Canada
19.66%
United Kingdom
10.96%
Australia
7.44%
Other
24.54%
Sectors
MOO
Consumer Staples
33.73%
Materials
25.19%
Industrials
19.63%
Health Care
16.61%
Other
4.83%
GNR
Materials
46.54%
Energy
34.59%
Other
18.87%
Advertisement
Diversification
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.39%
GNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.77%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
MOO
DEERE
7.69%
BAYER AG
7.49%
ZOETIS INC
6.79%
CORTEVA INC
6.70%
ARCHER DANIELS
5.89%
NUTRIEN LTD
5.72%
CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS
5.16%
TYSON FOODS
4.88%
KUBOTA
4.00%
CH1300646267
3.94%
WILMAR INTERNATIONAL
3.14%
MOWI ASA
3.09%
YARA INTL
2.93%
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC
2.68%
TORO
2.28%
GNR
NUTRIEN LTD
5.31%
SHELL PLC
5.11%
EXXON
5.04%
BHP GROUP LTD
4.49%
TOTALENERGIES SE
3.71%
CHEVRON TEXACO
2.84%
UPM-KYMMENE OY
2.82%
NEWMONT CORP
2.77%
CORTEVA INC
2.55%
BP
2.44%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.16%
US7594701077
2.00%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
1.95%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
1.89%
YARA INTL
1.70%
Frequently asked questions about MOO and GNR
How have the MOO and GNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 15, 2026, MOO is up 7.73% year-to-date (YTD), while GNR has returned 17.21%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or GNR?
Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$319M in flows, compared to +$352M for GNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or GNR?
Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 13.42%, while GNR experienced 14.9%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOO or GNR?
As of June 15, 2026, MOO holds $924.54 M in assets under management (AUM), while GNR manages $4.79 B.
What sectors do the MOO and GNR ETFs invest in?
MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, GNR focuses on Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and GNR ETF?
MOO top holdings include DEERE, BAYER AG and ZOETIS INC. GNR holds in its top three: NUTRIEN LTD, SHELL PLC and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: MOO or GNR?
MOO holds 47 securities with 72.39% of its assets in the top 15. GNR has 89 securities and a top 15 weight of 46.77%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MOO & GNR
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
GNR
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
December 18, 2023
MOO
Advertisement
Advertisement
