MOOvsGNRETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
-0.3%
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MOO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. In contrast, GNR's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. MOO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.4% for GNR. MOO is up 18.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$489M in YTD flows. GNR performs better with 27.79% YTD performance, and +$451M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOO and GNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MOO vs GNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOO GNR | +6.03%+4.50% | +11.30%+11.02% | +18.98%+27.79% | +18.12%+37.77% | +15.04%+55.47% | +5.51%+80.73% |
| Flows | MOO GNR | +$141M+$150M | +$169M+$99M | +$489M+$451M | +$453M+$733M | +$120M+$454M | +$309M+$1.66B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOO GNR | +13.43%+13.76% | +13.67%+15.10% | +14.66%+15.09% | +16.52%+17.89% |
| Max drawdown | MOO GNR | -3.05%-7.23% | -10.98%-10.66% | -22.31%-19.80% | -39.01%-25.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | MOO GNR | 23d43d | 193d158d | 852d457d | 1605d758d |
Trading data
MOO | GNR | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $86.48 | $78.59 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $86.79 | $78.56 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MOO | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MOO | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $86.48 | $78.59 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $1.19 B | $5.31 B |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
MOO | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index | S&P Global Natural Resources Index |
| N° of holdings | 46 | 87 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2007 | September 13, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MOO
USA
51.57%
Germany
9.81%
Norway
7.29%
Other
31.34%
GNR
USA
30.01%
Canada
17.9%
United Kingdom
9.47%
Australia
8.04%
Other
34.59%
Sectors
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
34.03%
Non-Energy Materi.
29.09%
Industrials
20.65%
Healthcare
16.24%
GNR
Non-Energy Materi.
58.43%
Energy
30.27%
Other
11.3%
Diversification
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.49%
GNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.69%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
MOO
Corteva, Inc.
8.92%
Bayer AG
8.89%
Deere & Co.
7.95%
Nutrien Ltd.
6.57%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.21%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.07%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.81%
Kubota Corp.
4.77%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
4.37%
Bunge Global SA
3.14%
Mowi ASA
3.01%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.58%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.57%
Yara International ASA
2.39%
CNH Industrial NV
2.24%
GNR
BHP Group Ltd.
5.17%
Nutrien Ltd.
4.93%
Shell Plc
4.53%
TotalEnergies SE
3.13%
Corteva, Inc.
2.84%
UPM-Kymmene Oyj
2.79%
Chevron Corp.
2.70%
Newmont Corp.
2.50%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.20%
BP Plc
2.04%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
2.04%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
1.78%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
1.73%
Glencore Plc
1.70%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.62%
Frequently asked questions about MOO and GNR
How have the MOO and GNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, MOO is up 18.98% year-to-date (YTD), while GNR has returned 27.79%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or GNR?
Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$489M in flows, compared to +$451M for GNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or GNR?
Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 13.67%, while GNR experienced 15.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOO or GNR?
As of September 11, 2026, MOO holds $1.19 B in assets under management (AUM), while GNR manages $5.31 B.
What sectors do the MOO and GNR ETFs invest in?
MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, GNR focuses on Non-Energy Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and GNR ETF?
MOO top holdings include Corteva, Inc., Bayer AG and Deere & Co.. GNR holds in its top three: BHP Group Ltd., Nutrien Ltd. and Shell Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: MOO or GNR?
MOO holds 46 securities with 72.49% of its assets in the top 15. GNR has 87 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.69%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MOO & GNR
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
GNR
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
December 18, 2023
MOO
Advertisement
Advertisement
