Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MOOvsGNRETF Comparison
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MOO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. In contrast, GNR's top sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. MOO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.4% for GNR. MOO is up 15.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$299M in YTD flows. GNR performs better with 18.15% YTD performance, and +$274M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOO and GNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MOO vs GNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOO GNR | -2.06%-0.51% | +15.35%+19.46% | +15.03%+18.15% | +25.31%+45.01% | +7.87%+47.10% | +6.97%+69.47% |
| Flows | MOO GNR | +$44M+$45M | +$295M+$351M | +$299M+$274M | +$266M+$812M | -$224M+$87M | +$91M+$1.83B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOO GNR | +13.81%+18.85% | +15.71%+16.90% | +14.91%+15.74% | +16.35%+18.19% |
| Max drawdown | MOO GNR | -4.90%-4.57% | -12.71%-14.74% | -26.51%-19.80% | -39.01%-25.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | MOO GNR | 20d9d | 43d82d | 1015d457d | 1421d758d |
MOO | GNR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $84.76 | $73.65 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $83.78 | $73.62 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MOO | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MOO | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $84.76 | $73.65 |
| 1D performance | +1.17% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $970.45 M | $4.80 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.4% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MOO and GNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MOO is up 15.03% year-to-date (YTD), while GNR has returned 18.15%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or GNR?
Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$299M in flows, compared to +$274M for GNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or GNR?
Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 15.71%, while GNR experienced 16.9%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOO or GNR?
As of March 11, 2026, MOO holds $970.45 M in assets under management (AUM), while GNR manages $4.80 B.
What sectors do the MOO and GNR ETFs invest in?
MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, GNR focuses on Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and GNR ETF?
MOO top holdings include DEERE, BAYER AG and ZOETIS INC. GNR holds in its top three: NUTRIEN LTD, EXXON and BHP GROUP LTD.
Which ETF is more diversified: MOO or GNR?
MOO holds 47 securities with 70.5% of its assets in the top 15. GNR has 89 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.62%.
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
