BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

MOOvsCGWETF Comparison

ETF 1

MOO

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

This fund is part of

Natural Resources

+0.48%

Full MOO fund page

VS

ETF 2

CGW

Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF

This fund is part of

Natural Resources

+0.48%

Full CGW fund page

VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MOO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. MOO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.59% for CGW. MOO is up 12.44% year-to-date (YTD) with +$476M in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 4.23% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOO and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

MOO vs CGW performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 10/23/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	MOO CGW	-3.23%+3.92%	-0.99%+1.58%	+12.44%+4.23%	+13.44%+1.45%	+22.23%+53.32%	-3.90%+21.87%
Flows	MOO CGW	-$94M-$358K	+$148M-$358K	+$476M+$41M	+$455M+$46M	+$134M-$126M	+$292M-$205M

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	MOO CGW	+13.42%+12.04%	+13.92%+13.17%	+14.53%+13.59%	+16.50%+15.75%
Max drawdown	MOO CGW	-9.40%-7.04%	-10.98%-10.52%	-17.98%-14.42%	-39.01%-32.65%
Max drawdown duration	MOO CGW	51d79d	193d239d	531d227d	1647d862d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	MOO	CGW
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM	$81.24	$63.91
Previous close 10/23/2026	$81.69	$65.42
Consolidated volume 10/23/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of September 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	MOO	CGW
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	MOO	CGW
Last price	$81.24	$63.91
1D performance	-0.55%	-2.31%
AuM	$1.11 B	$1.06 B
E/R	0.56%	0.59%

Characteristics

	MOO	CGW
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	VanEck	Invesco
Benchmark	MVIS Global Agribusiness Index	S&P Global Water Index
N° of holdings	46	66
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	August 31, 2007	May 14, 2007
ESG	No	Yes

More MOO data on Trackinsight

More CGW data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

MOO

USA

50.98%

Germany

9.84%

Norway

7.56%

Other

31.62%

CGW

USA

56.47%

United Kingdom

14.4%

Brazil

9.59%

Switzerland

7.03%

Other

12.51%

Sectors

MOO

Consumer Non-Cycl.

34.08%

Non-Energy Materi.

28.69%

Industrials

21.21%

Healthcare

16.02%

Other

0%

CGW

Utilities

45.36%

Industrials

35.72%

Non-Energy Materi.

15.65%

Other

3.28%

Diversification

MOO

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

72.06%

CGW

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

67.56%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of August 31, 2026

MOO

Bayer AG

8.83%

Corteva, Inc.

8.24%

Deere & Co.

8.24%

Nutrien Ltd.

6.72%

Zoetis, Inc.

5.22%

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.

5.05%

CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

4.74%

Kubota Corp.

4.62%

Tyson Foods, Inc.

3.93%

Bunge Global SA

3.40%

Mowi ASA

3.08%

Darling Ingredients, Inc.

2.68%

CNH Industrial NV

2.49%

Wilmar International Ltd.

2.45%

Yara International ASA

2.39%

CGW

American Water Works Co., Inc.

8.20%

Xylem, Inc.

7.51%

Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP

6.77%

Essential Utilities, Inc.

5.80%

United Utilities Group Plc

5.75%

Severn Trent Plc

5.19%

Veralto Corp.

4.77%

Ecolab, Inc.

4.12%

Geberit AG

3.81%

Watts Water Technologies, Inc.

3.44%

Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

3.35%

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.

2.42%

American States Water Co.

2.34%

Core & Main, Inc.

2.08%

California Water Service Group

2.02%

Frequently asked questions about MOO and CGW

How have the MOO and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 23, 2026, MOO is up 12.44% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 4.23%. That puts MOO better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or CGW?

Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$476M in flows, compared to +$41M for CGW.

Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or CGW?

Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 13.92%, while CGW experienced 13.17%.

Which ETF is bigger: MOO or CGW?

As of October 23, 2026, MOO holds $1.11 B in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.06 B.

What sectors do the MOO and CGW ETFs invest in?

MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.

What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and CGW ETF?

MOO top holdings include Bayer AG, Corteva, Inc. and Deere & Co.. CGW holds in its top three: American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP.

MOOvsCGWETF Comparison

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF

MOO vs CGW performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the MOO and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 23, 2026, MOO is up 12.44% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 4.23%. That puts MOO better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or CGW?

Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$476M in flows, compared to +$41M for CGW.

Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or CGW?

Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 13.92%, while CGW experienced 13.17%.

Which ETF is bigger: MOO or CGW?

As of October 23, 2026, MOO holds $1.11 B in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.06 B.

What sectors do the MOO and CGW ETFs invest in?

MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.

What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and CGW ETF?

MOO top holdings include Bayer AG, Corteva, Inc. and Deere & Co.. CGW holds in its top three: American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP.

Which ETF is more diversified: MOO or CGW?

MOO holds 46 securities with 72.06% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 66 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.56%.

Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?

There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water

Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection