Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MNZLvsSPTMETF Comparison
Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) is part of the US All Cap segment. MNZL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, SPTM's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. MNZL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.03% for SPTM. MNZL is down -1.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. SPTM performs worse with -2.62% YTD performance, and +$136M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MNZL and SPTM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MNZL vs SPTM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MNZL SPTM | -5.17%-3.84% | -1.03%-1.72% | -1.38%-2.62% | n/a+19.14% | n/a+71.86% | n/a+77.27% |
| Flows | MNZL SPTM | +$2M+$262M | +$4M+$177M | +$3M+$136M | -+$813M | -+$2.00B | -+$3.20B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MNZL SPTM | +13.61%+12.02% | n/a+18.15% | n/a+14.82% | n/a+16.88% |
| Max drawdown | MNZL SPTM | -6.11%-4.88% | n/a-13.79% | n/a-18.88% | n/a-24.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | MNZL SPTM | 35d37d | n/a45d | n/a126d | n/a707d |
MNZL | SPTM | |
Last sale 3/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $50.85 | $80.31 |
| Previous close 03/18/2026 | $51.57 | $81.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MNZL | SPTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MNZL | SPTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.85 | $80.31 |
| 1D performance | -1.40% | -1.36% |
| AuM | $4.57 M | $11.84 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.03% |
MNZL | SPTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Manzil | SPDR |
| Benchmark | Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Custom Index | S&P Composite 1500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 405 | 1418 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 19, 2025 | October 4, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MNZL and SPTM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 18, 2026, MNZL is down -1.38% year-to-date (YTD), while SPTM has lost -2.62%. That puts MNZL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MNZL or SPTM?
Year-to-date, the MNZL ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$136M for SPTM.
Which ETF is bigger: MNZL or SPTM?
As of March 18, 2026, MNZL holds $4.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while SPTM manages $11.84 B.
What sectors do the MNZL and SPTM ETFs invest in?
MNZL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, SPTM focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the MNZL ETF and SPTM ETF?
MNZL top holdings include APPLE, BROADCOM LIMITED and TESLA. SPTM holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: MNZL or SPTM?
MNZL holds 445 securities with 43.62% of its assets in the top 15. SPTM has 1504 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.58%.
How to avoid the capital gains mutual funds distribute even in down markets
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
