Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MMTMvsFQALETF Comparison
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. MMTM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, FQAL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. MMTM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.15% for FQAL. MMTM is up 0.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$560K in YTD flows. FQAL performs worse with 0.08% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MMTM and FQAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MMTM vs FQAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MMTM FQAL | -2.21%-1.88% | -1.10%-0.12% | +0.17%+0.08% | +22.78%+18.68% | +85.16%+75.06% | +90.58%+82.42% |
| Flows | MMTM FQAL | -+$108K | +$6M+$15M | +$560K+$8M | -$4M-$57M | +$37M+$527M | +$22M+$616M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MMTM FQAL | +15.09%+11.30% | +20.98%+16.77% | +17.47%+13.96% | +18.28%+16.21% |
| Max drawdown | MMTM FQAL | -4.37%-2.75% | -15.18%-12.41% | -21.93%-16.70% | -23.80%-25.39% |
| Max drawdown duration | MMTM FQAL | 13d13d | 48d45d | 155d126d | 708d750d |
MMTM | FQAL | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $292.50 | $75.39 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $292.20 | $75.71 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MMTM | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MMTM | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $292.50 | $75.39 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | -0.42% |
| AuM | $163.68 M | $1.16 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MMTM and FQAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, MMTM is up 0.17% year-to-date (YTD), while FQAL has returned 0.08%. That puts MMTM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MMTM or FQAL?
Year-to-date, the MMTM ETF saw +$560K in flows, compared to +$8M for FQAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: MMTM or FQAL?
Over the past year, MMTM had a volatility of 20.98%, while FQAL experienced 16.77%.
Which ETF is bigger: MMTM or FQAL?
As of March 10, 2026, MMTM holds $163.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while FQAL manages $1.16 B.
What sectors do the MMTM and FQAL ETFs invest in?
MMTM leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, FQAL focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the MMTM ETF and FQAL ETF?
MMTM top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE. FQAL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: MMTM or FQAL?
MMTM holds 1484 securities with 49.81% of its assets in the top 15. FQAL has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.59%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
