Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MLPDvsUSAIETF Comparison
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF - Distributing
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Pacer American Energy Independence ETF - Distributing (USAI) is part of the Infrastructure segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. MLPD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.75% for USAI. MLPD is up 4.63% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. USAI performs better with 20.33% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MLPD and USAI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MLPD vs USAI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MLPD USAI | +0.97%+6.09% | +6.10%+20.85% | +4.63%+20.33% | +20.71%+23.98% | n/a+102.15% | n/a+166.85% |
| Flows | MLPD USAI | +$4M- | +$7M-$2M | +$6M-$2M | +$10M-$8M | -+$13M | -+$42M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MLPD USAI | +10.22%+15.62% | +14.66%+19.92% | n/a+17.49% | n/a+20.47% |
| Max drawdown | MLPD USAI | -1.68%-3.40% | -12.85%-16.04% | n/a-18.00% | n/a-20.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | MLPD USAI | 8d9d | 61d308d | n/a372d | n/a533d |
MLPD | USAI | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.73 | $46.10 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $25.67 | $45.58 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MLPD | USAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MLPD | USAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.73 | $46.10 |
| 1D performance | +0.22% | +1.14% |
| AuM | $20.18 M | $95.70 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.75% |
MLPD | USAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Cboe MLPX ATM BuyWrite Index | American Energy Independence Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 24 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 7, 2024 | October 10, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MLPD and USAI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, MLPD is up 4.63% year-to-date (YTD), while USAI has returned 20.33%. That puts USAI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MLPD or USAI?
Year-to-date, the MLPD ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to -$2M for USAI.
Which ETF is more volatile: MLPD or USAI?
Over the past year, MLPD had a volatility of 14.66%, while USAI experienced 19.92%.
Which ETF is bigger: MLPD or USAI?
As of March 10, 2026, MLPD holds $20.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while USAI manages $95.70 M.
What sectors do the MLPD and USAI ETFs invest in?
MLPD leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, USAI focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the MLPD ETF and USAI ETF?
MLPD top holdings include WILLIAMS, TC ENERGY CORP and ENBRIDGE. USAI holds in its top three: WILLIAMS, KINDER MORGAN and ENERGY TRANSFER LP UNITS.
Which ETF is more diversified: MLPD or USAI?
MLPD holds 26 securities with 90.42% of its assets in the top 15. USAI has 26 securities and a top 15 weight of 76.23%.
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
