MGNRvsMOOETF Comparison
VS
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MGNR's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. MGNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.56% for MOO. MGNR is up 10.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$925M in YTD flows. MOO performs worse with 10.56% YTD performance, and +$464M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MGNR and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MGNR vs MOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MGNR MOO | -3.01%-3.29% | +1.45%-3.83% | +10.74%+10.56% | +20.12%+11.98% | n/a+20.32% | n/a-5.16% |
| Flows | MGNR MOO | +$27M-$77M | +$463M+$136M | +$925M+$464M | +$979M+$442M | -+$130M | -+$275M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MGNR MOO | +21.53%+13.32% | +23.86%+13.93% | n/a+14.54% | n/a+16.48% |
| Max drawdown | MGNR MOO | -16.16%-9.40% | -16.59%-10.98% | n/a-17.98% | n/a-39.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | MGNR MOO | 64d56d | 148d193d | n/a531d | n/a1652d |
Trading data
MGNR | MOO | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.94 | $80.72 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $48.58 | $80.26 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MGNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMGNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MGNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.94 | $80.72 |
| 1D performance | -1.32% | +0.57% |
| AuM | $1.25 B | $1.08 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
MGNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | American Beacon | VanEck |
| Benchmark | - | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index |
| N° of holdings | 44 | 46 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2024 | August 31, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MGNR
USA
48.17%
Canada
28.99%
Other
22.84%
MOO
USA
50.98%
Germany
9.84%
Norway
7.56%
Other
31.62%
Sectors
MGNR
Non-Energy Materi.
59.73%
Energy
25.15%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.82%
Other
7.3%
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
34.08%
Non-Energy Materi.
28.69%
Industrials
21.21%
Healthcare
16.02%
Other
0%
Advertisement
Diversification
MGNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.85%
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.06%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MGNR
ArcelorMittal SA
4.49%
Venture Global, Inc.
4.23%
Teck Resources Limited
4.14%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
4.07%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
4.03%
Smurfit WestRock Plc
4.03%
Range Resources Corp.
3.86%
Kinross Gold Corp.
3.82%
Equinox Gold Corp.
3.68%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
3.57%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
3.52%
Antero Resources Corp.
3.51%
Vista Energy SAB de CV
3.47%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
3.32%
Bunge Global SA
3.10%
MOO
Bayer AG
8.83%
Corteva, Inc.
8.24%
Deere & Co.
8.24%
Nutrien Ltd.
6.72%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.22%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.05%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.74%
Kubota Corp.
4.62%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
3.93%
Bunge Global SA
3.40%
Mowi ASA
3.08%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.68%
CNH Industrial NV
2.49%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.45%
Yara International ASA
2.39%
Frequently asked questions about MGNR and MOO
How have the MGNR and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, MGNR is up 10.74% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 10.56%. That puts MGNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MGNR or MOO?
Year-to-date, the MGNR ETF saw +$925M in flows, compared to +$464M for MOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: MGNR or MOO?
Over the past year, MGNR had a volatility of 23.86%, while MOO experienced 13.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: MGNR or MOO?
As of October 28, 2026, MGNR holds $1.25 B in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $1.08 B.
What sectors do the MGNR and MOO ETFs invest in?
MGNR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MGNR ETF and MOO ETF?
MGNR top holdings include ArcelorMittal SA, Venture Global, Inc. and Teck Resources Limited. MOO holds in its top three: Bayer AG, Corteva, Inc. and Deere & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: MGNR or MOO?
MGNR holds 44 securities with 56.85% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.06%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MGNR & MOO
Advertisement
