MGNRvsMOOETF Comparison
VS
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MGNR's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. MGNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.56% for MOO. MGNR is up 12.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$463M in YTD flows. MOO performs better with 14.81% YTD performance, and +$332M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MGNR and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MGNR vs MOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MGNR MOO | +1.18%+5.27% | -8.90%-0.34% | +12.05%+14.81% | +49.47%+17.11% | n/a+4.06% | n/a+2.71% |
| Flows | MGNR MOO | +$29M+$4M | +$132M-$161M | +$463M+$332M | +$584M+$277M | --$54M | -+$138M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MGNR MOO | +24.29%+12.94% | +23.89%+13.35% | n/a+14.58% | n/a+16.45% |
| Max drawdown | MGNR MOO | -15.40%-9.34% | -15.40%-10.98% | n/a-26.29% | n/a-39.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | MGNR MOO | 58d86d | 58d161d | n/a910d | n/a1562d |
Trading data
MGNR | MOO | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.77 | $81.72 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $49.18 | $83.52 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MGNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMGNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MGNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.77 | $81.72 |
| 1D performance | -0.83% | -2.16% |
| AuM | $847.68 M | $997.77 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
MGNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | American Beacon | VanEck |
| Benchmark | - | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index |
| N° of holdings | 44 | 46 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2024 | August 31, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MGNR
USA
50.31%
Canada
22.92%
Other
26.77%
MOO
USA
52.47%
Germany
9.66%
Other
37.87%
Sectors
MGNR
Non-Energy Materi.
53.87%
Energy
25.46%
Industrials
12.39%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.66%
Other
0.62%
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
33.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
27.89%
Industrials
22.41%
Healthcare
16.13%
Other
0%
Advertisement
Diversification
MGNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.98%
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
MGNR
Smurfit WestRock Plc
4.89%
Teck Resources Limited
4.84%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
4.48%
ArcelorMittal SA
4.08%
Range Resources Corp.
3.65%
Vista Energy SAB de CV
3.49%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
3.27%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
3.27%
Antero Resources Corp.
3.20%
Nextpower, Inc.
3.13%
Alcoa Corp.
3.13%
Bloom Energy Corp.
3.08%
Bunge Global SA
2.98%
Kinross Gold Corp.
2.84%
Venture Global, Inc.
2.66%
MOO
Bayer AG
8.82%
Corteva, Inc.
8.78%
Deere & Co.
8.78%
Nutrien Ltd.
5.99%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.30%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.10%
Kubota Corp.
4.76%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
4.46%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.25%
Bunge Global SA
3.44%
Mowi ASA
2.84%
CNH Industrial NV
2.61%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.49%
The Toro Co.
2.45%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.37%
Frequently asked questions about MGNR and MOO
How have the MGNR and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, MGNR is up 12.05% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 14.81%. That puts MOO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MGNR or MOO?
Year-to-date, the MGNR ETF saw +$463M in flows, compared to +$332M for MOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: MGNR or MOO?
Over the past year, MGNR had a volatility of 23.89%, while MOO experienced 13.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: MGNR or MOO?
As of July 30, 2026, MGNR holds $847.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $997.77 M.
What sectors do the MGNR and MOO ETFs invest in?
MGNR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MGNR ETF and MOO ETF?
MGNR top holdings include Smurfit WestRock Plc, Teck Resources Limited and Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. MOO holds in its top three: Bayer AG, Corteva, Inc. and Deere & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: MGNR or MOO?
MGNR holds 44 securities with 52.98% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.43%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MGNR & MOO
Advertisement
