Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MFVLvsCOWZETF Comparison
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is part of the US Large Cap segment. MFVL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, COWZ's top sector exposures are Health Care, Energy and Information Technology. MFVL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.49% for COWZ. MFVL is down -0.51% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. COWZ performs better with 3.77% YTD performance, and -$479M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MFVL and COWZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MFVL vs COWZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MFVL COWZ | -3.40%-2.70% | -0.69%+2.79% | -0.51%+3.77% | n/a+18.64% | n/a+46.70% | n/a+70.87% |
| Flows | MFVL COWZ | +$2M-$15M | +$6M-$628M | +$4M-$479M | --$8.01B | -+$758M | -+$13.19B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MFVL COWZ | +11.41%+10.92% | n/a+17.71% | n/a+15.64% | n/a+17.75% |
| Max drawdown | MFVL COWZ | -4.18%-3.83% | n/a-14.75% | n/a-21.93% | n/a-21.93% |
| Max drawdown duration | MFVL COWZ | 12d12d | n/a103d | n/a373d | n/a373d |
MFVL | COWZ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.20 | $62.24 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $20.26 | $62.44 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MFVL | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MFVL | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.20 | $62.24 |
| 1D performance | -0.32% | -0.32% |
| AuM | $6.46 M | $18.18 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.49% |
MFVL | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Motley Fool Asset Management | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Motley Fool Value Index | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 106 | 98 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2025 | December 16, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MFVL and COWZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, MFVL is down -0.51% year-to-date (YTD), while COWZ has returned 3.77%. That puts COWZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MFVL or COWZ?
Year-to-date, the MFVL ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to -$479M for COWZ.
Which ETF is bigger: MFVL or COWZ?
As of March 13, 2026, MFVL holds $6.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while COWZ manages $18.18 B.
What sectors do the MFVL and COWZ ETFs invest in?
MFVL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, COWZ focuses on Health Care, Energy and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the MFVL ETF and COWZ ETF?
MFVL top holdings include CHEVRON TEXACO, FEDEX and WALMART INC. COWZ holds in its top three: NEWMONT CORP, EXXON and GILEAD SCIENCES.
Which ETF is more diversified: MFVL or COWZ?
MFVL holds 110 securities with 60.94% of its assets in the top 15. COWZ has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.62%.
Hiding in Plain Sight: The Case for 'Unloved' Dividend Payers in ETFs
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
Recap of the Most Interesting Recent ETF Filings For the NYSE
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
