MFVLvsCOWZETF Comparison
VS
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is part of the US Large Cap segment. MFVL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, COWZ's top sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Energy. MFVL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.49% for COWZ. MFVL is down -2.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. COWZ performs better with 3.18% YTD performance, and +$1.91B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MFVL and COWZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MFVL vs COWZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MFVL COWZ | -2.03%-2.63% | -0.60%-0.44% | -2.39%+3.18% | n/a+15.70% | n/a+40.36% | n/a+64.26% |
| Flows | MFVL COWZ | +$814K+$2.80B | +$814K+$2.39B | +$5M+$1.91B | --$2.61B | -+$2.71B | -+$15.21B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MFVL COWZ | +13.17%+10.28% | n/a+11.38% | n/a+14.91% | n/a+17.61% |
| Max drawdown | MFVL COWZ | -5.32%-5.47% | n/a-5.47% | n/a-21.93% | n/a-21.93% |
| Max drawdown duration | MFVL COWZ | 17d17d | n/a17d | n/a373d | n/a373d |
Trading data
MFVL | COWZ | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $19.82 | $61.80 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $19.83 | $62.22 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MFVL | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MFVL | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $19.82 | $61.80 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | -0.68% |
| AuM | $7.13 M | $20.46 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.49% |
Characteristics
MFVL | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Motley Fool Asset Management | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Motley Fool Value Index | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 97 | 99 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2025 | December 16, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MFVL
USA
99.6%
Other
0.4%
COWZ
USA
95.13%
Other
4.87%
Sectors
MFVL
Information Techn.
25.33%
Consumer Discreti.
19.24%
Health Care
19.24%
Communication Ser.
10.79%
Energy
10.22%
Other
15.18%
COWZ
Health Care
20.98%
Information Techn.
20.81%
Energy
15.86%
Consumer Discreti.
12.47%
Industrials
9.76%
Communication Ser.
8.02%
Other
12.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
MFVL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.48%
COWZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.04%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
MFVL
CVS HEALTH CORP
5.29%
WALT DISNEY
4.97%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
4.91%
FEDEX
4.56%
ADOBE INC
4.48%
EXXON
4.40%
SALESFORCE INC
4.32%
CHEVRON TEXACO
4.31%
T-MOBILE US INC
4.23%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
3.90%
HCA HEALTHCARE
3.68%
PAYPAL HOLDINGS
3.60%
NIKE INC -CL
2.64%
AIRBNB
2.28%
BLOCK INC
1.91%
COWZ
QUALCOMM
2.27%
CONOCOPHILLIPS
2.13%
FORD MOTOR
2.11%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
2.08%
CVS HEALTH CORP
2.06%
NEWMONT CORP
2.05%
ALTRIA GROUP
2.03%
PFIZER
2.03%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
2.00%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
1.96%
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY
1.92%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
1.89%
MCKESSON
1.85%
AT&T
1.83%
SALESFORCE INC
1.83%
Frequently asked questions about MFVL and COWZ
How have the MFVL and COWZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, MFVL is down -2.39% year-to-date (YTD), while COWZ has returned 3.18%. That puts COWZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MFVL or COWZ?
Year-to-date, the MFVL ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$1.91B for COWZ.
Which ETF is bigger: MFVL or COWZ?
As of June 18, 2026, MFVL holds $7.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while COWZ manages $20.46 B.
What sectors do the MFVL and COWZ ETFs invest in?
MFVL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, COWZ focuses on Health Care, Information Technology and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the MFVL ETF and COWZ ETF?
MFVL top holdings include CVS HEALTH CORP, WALT DISNEY and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB. COWZ holds in its top three: QUALCOMM, CONOCOPHILLIPS and FORD MOTOR.
Which ETF is more diversified: MFVL or COWZ?
MFVL holds 100 securities with 59.48% of its assets in the top 15. COWZ has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.04%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MFVL & COWZ
Hiding in Plain Sight: The Case for 'Unloved' Dividend Payers in ETFs
March 24, 2025
COWZ
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
October 10, 2024
COWZ
Recap of the Most Interesting Recent ETF Filings For the NYSE
June 29, 2023
COWZ
Pacer Cash Cows ETFs: Investing in Quality Stocks
April 28, 2023
COWZ
Advertisement
Advertisement
