MCHSvsCNYAETF Comparison
VS
Matthews China Innovators Active ETF (MCHS) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. MCHS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, CNYA's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. MCHS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.6% for CNYA. MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. CNYA performs worse with -6.7% YTD performance, and -$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCHS and CNYA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCHS vs CNYA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCHS CNYA | -7.62%-7.89% | -15.21%-10.51% | +12.94%-6.70% | +12.22%-4.28% | n/a+26.96% | n/a-15.37% |
| Flows | MCHS CNYA | -$3M-$25M | -$3M-$39M | +$15M-$33M | +$15M-$77M | --$130M | --$290M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCHS CNYA | +26.07%+17.84% | +29.55%+18.08% | n/a+19.44% | n/a+19.61% |
| Max drawdown | MCHS CNYA | -16.66%-12.42% | -29.74%-17.39% | n/a-21.36% | n/a-44.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCHS CNYA | 60d60d | 108d116d | n/a318d | n/a1769d |
Trading data
MCHS | CNYA | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.55 | $32.01 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $36.43 | $31.80 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCHS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCHS | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCHS | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.55 | $32.01 |
| 1D performance | +0.35% | +0.66% |
| AuM | $14.69 M | $165.34 M |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
MCHS | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Matthews Asia | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI China A Inclusion Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 416 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2024 | June 13, 2016 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Exposure
Countries
MCHS
China
63.71%
Hong Kong
15.04%
Taiwan
10.72%
Other
10.53%
CNYA
China
100.64%
Other
-0.64%
Sectors
MCHS
Technology
35.23%
Industrials
28.55%
Healthcare
7.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.42%
Other
21.35%
CNYA
Technology
30.44%
Finance
18.67%
Industrials
15.65%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.95%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.63%
Other
12.66%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCHS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.46%
CNYA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.31%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MCHS
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
5.57%
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
5.39%
NetEase, Inc.
4.48%
Beijing Huafeng Test & Control Technology Co., Ltd.
4.17%
Neway Valve (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
4.01%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.97%
Luckin Coffee, Inc.
3.79%
Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
3.52%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd.
3.21%
Acter Technology Integration Group Co., Ltd.
2.93%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
2.87%
Wasion Holdings Ltd.
2.74%
Wuxi NCE Power Co., Ltd.
2.63%
Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.61%
Minth Group Ltd.
2.60%
CNYA
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
3.26%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.18%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
1.90%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
1.65%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
1.50%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
1.36%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
1.36%
Foxconn Industrial Internet Co., Ltd.
1.33%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.23%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.19%
Agricultural Bank of China Ltd.
1.17%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
1.13%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.06%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.00%
BYD Co., Ltd.
0.97%
Frequently asked questions about MCHS and CNYA
How have the MCHS and CNYA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD), while CNYA has lost -6.7%. That puts MCHS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCHS or CNYA?
Year-to-date, the MCHS ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to -$33M for CNYA.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCHS or CNYA?
Over the past year, MCHS had a volatility of 29.55%, while CNYA experienced 18.08%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCHS or CNYA?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS holds $14.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while CNYA manages $165.34 M.
What sectors do the MCHS and CNYA ETFs invest in?
MCHS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, CNYA focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MCHS ETF and CNYA ETF?
MCHS top holdings include Midea Group Co. Ltd., SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. and NetEase, Inc.. CNYA holds in its top three: Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd., Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. and Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCHS or CNYA?
MCHS holds 44 securities with 54.46% of its assets in the top 15. CNYA has 416 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.31%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MCHS & CNYA
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
CNYA
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
CNYA
Advertisement
Advertisement
