MCHIvsKWEBETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) belongs to the China Blended Cap segment. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is part of the EM Awakening segment. MCHI's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, KWEB's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. MCHI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.7% for KWEB. MCHI is down -9.52% year-to-date (YTD) with -$874M in YTD flows. KWEB performs worse with -19.91% YTD performance, and -$833M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCHI and KWEB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCHI vs KWEB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/20/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCHI KWEB | +2.41%+9.45% | -8.07%-8.69% | -9.52%-19.91% | -4.28%-19.20% | +28.63%+8.89% | -21.25%-45.46% |
| Flows | MCHI KWEB | -$96M-$373M | -$290M-$427M | -$874M-$833M | -$164M+$513M | -$1.98B+$1.39B | +$2.72B+$7.23B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCHI KWEB | +21.10%+28.05% | +19.87%+24.72% | +24.51%+30.18% | +28.58%+40.79% |
| Max drawdown | MCHI KWEB | -15.32%-21.66% | -23.40%-42.02% | -25.77%-42.02% | -53.66%-67.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCHI KWEB | 68d91d | 291d291d | 422d291d | 1824d1824d |
Trading data
MCHI | KWEB | |
Last sale 7/21/2026 at 3:52 PM | $54.11 | $27.10 |
| Previous close 07/20/2026 | $54.08 | $27.44 |
| Consolidated volume 07/20/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCHI | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/21/2026 at 3:52 PM
Live
Closed
MCHI | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.11 | $27.10 |
| 1D performance | +0.05% | -1.26% |
| AuM | $6.14 B | $5.43 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.7% |
Characteristics
MCHI | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI China Index | CSI Overseas China Internet Index |
| N° of holdings | 524 | 33 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 29, 2011 | July 31, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCHI
China
89.6%
Other
10.4%
KWEB
China
81.9%
Ireland
7.92%
Other
10.18%
Sectors
MCHI
Technology
30.49%
Finance
20.69%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.94%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.16%
Other
27.73%
KWEB
Technology
41.73%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
26.87%
Consumer Services
13.19%
Other
18.21%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCHI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.56%
KWEB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.49%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
MCHI
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
14.21%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.35%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.65%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.25%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.99%
NetEase, Inc.
1.91%
Meituan
1.85%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
1.82%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.80%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.79%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.43%
Baidu, Inc.
1.23%
JD.com, Inc.
1.22%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
1.07%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
0.98%
KWEB
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.44%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
7.92%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.70%
NetEase, Inc.
6.97%
Meituan
6.83%
Baidu, Inc.
4.19%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
4.15%
Kuaishou Technology
4.08%
KE Holdings, Inc.
3.89%
JD.com, Inc.
3.88%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
3.69%
Bilibili, Inc.
3.65%
JD Health International, Inc.
3.50%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
3.39%
Kanzhun Ltd.
3.21%
Frequently asked questions about MCHI and KWEB
How have the MCHI and KWEB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 20, 2026, MCHI is down -9.52% year-to-date (YTD), while KWEB has lost -19.91%. That puts MCHI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCHI or KWEB?
Year-to-date, the MCHI ETF saw -$874M in flows, compared to -$833M for KWEB.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCHI or KWEB?
Over the past year, MCHI had a volatility of 19.87%, while KWEB experienced 24.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCHI or KWEB?
As of July 20, 2026, MCHI holds $6.14 B in assets under management (AUM), while KWEB manages $5.43 B.
What sectors do the MCHI and KWEB ETFs invest in?
MCHI leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, KWEB focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services.
What are the top holdings of the MCHI ETF and KWEB ETF?
MCHI top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp.. KWEB holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., PDD Holdings, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCHI or KWEB?
MCHI holds 574 securities with 45.56% of its assets in the top 15. KWEB has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.49%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MCHI & KWEB
U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets
December 18, 2025
KWEB
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
KWEB
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KWEB
There's an ETF for that? The Top 3 ETFs for Investing in India
March 26, 2024
KWEB
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Advertisement
