MCHIvsCQQQETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. MCHI's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Communication Services. In contrast, CQQQ's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. MCHI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.65% for CQQQ. MCHI is down -9.79% year-to-date (YTD) with -$778M in YTD flows. CQQQ performs better with -0.95% YTD performance, and +$317M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCHI and CQQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCHI vs CQQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCHI CQQQ | -5.19%+1.76% | -3.25%+5.76% | -9.79%-0.95% | +1.34%+24.10% | +29.87%+31.76% | -25.72%-33.83% |
| Flows | MCHI CQQQ | -$126M+$303M | -$523M+$159M | -$778M+$317M | -$69M+$2.02B | -$2.04B+$2.18B | +$2.80B+$2.21B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCHI CQQQ | +21.54%+32.86% | +19.24%+27.91% | +24.59%+29.22% | +28.56%+32.94% |
| Max drawdown | MCHI CQQQ | -8.99%-12.15% | -17.66%-24.05% | -25.77%-35.95% | -56.84%-67.09% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCHI CQQQ | 23d56d | 246d242d | 422d470d | 1803d1803d |
Trading data
MCHI | CQQQ | |
Last sale 6/5/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.44 | $51.11 |
| Previous close 06/04/2026 | $55.73 | $53.83 |
| Consolidated volume 06/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCHI | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/5/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCHI | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.44 | $51.11 |
| 1D performance | -2.31% | -5.05% |
| AuM | $6.26 B | $3.08 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.65% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCHI
Cayman Islands
46.6%
China
43.94%
Other
9.46%
CQQQ
Cayman Islands
44.69%
China
40.63%
USA
11.03%
Other
3.65%
Sectors
MCHI
Consumer Discreti.
25.53%
Financials
19.05%
Communication Ser.
18.28%
Information Techn.
8.57%
Other
28.57%
CQQQ
Information Techn.
41.28%
Communication Ser.
26.48%
Consumer Discreti.
17.32%
Other
14.92%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCHI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.38%
CQQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.46%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
MCHI
TENCENT HOLDINGS
14.12%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
10.24%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK
3.99%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
2.62%
XIAOMI CORP
2.36%
INDUSTRIAL COMMERC BK CHINA
2.16%
PING AN
2.00%
MEITUAN
1.95%
BYD
1.79%
BANK OF CHINA
1.69%
NETEASE INC
1.48%
JD.COM INC
1.32%
BAIDU
1.25%
TRIP.COM GROUP
1.22%
PETROCHINA
1.20%
CQQQ
TENCENT HOLDINGS
8.53%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
8.45%
MEITUAN
8.39%
BAIDU
7.03%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
4.31%
HUA HONG SEMICONDUCTOR
3.65%
KYG4602S1057
3.10%
SENSETIME GROUP INC
2.63%
CNE100005PT2
2.49%
BILIBILI
2.20%
CAMBRICON TECHNOLOGIES CORP LTD
2.07%
SUNNY OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY
1.98%
TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP ADR
1.63%
GDS HOLDINGS
1.61%
KINGBOARD LAMINATES HOLDINGS
1.39%
Frequently asked questions about MCHI and CQQQ
How have the MCHI and CQQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 5, 2026, MCHI is down -9.79% year-to-date (YTD), while CQQQ has lost -0.95%. That puts CQQQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCHI or CQQQ?
Year-to-date, the MCHI ETF saw -$778M in flows, compared to +$317M for CQQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCHI or CQQQ?
Over the past year, MCHI had a volatility of 19.24%, while CQQQ experienced 27.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCHI or CQQQ?
As of June 5, 2026, MCHI holds $6.26 B in assets under management (AUM), while CQQQ manages $3.08 B.
What sectors do the MCHI and CQQQ ETFs invest in?
MCHI leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, CQQQ focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the MCHI ETF and CQQQ ETF?
MCHI top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK. CQQQ holds in its top three: TENCENT HOLDINGS, PINDUODUO INC ADR and MEITUAN.
Which ETF is more diversified: MCHI or CQQQ?
MCHI holds 578 securities with 49.38% of its assets in the top 15. CQQQ has 173 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.46%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MCHI & CQQQ
There's an ETF for that? The Top 3 ETFs for Investing in India
March 26, 2024
MCHI
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
MCHI
CQQQ
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
MCHI
CQQQ
Advertisement
International Markets Outperforming: ETFs to Watch in 2023
May 8, 2023
MCHI
International Markets Outperforming: ETFs to Watch in 2023
May 8, 2023
MCHI
Growth Potential of China ETFs
January 30, 2023
MCHI
China Reopening: 3 Chinese Equity ETFs to Watch
January 26, 2023
MCHI
Advertisement
