MCHvsCNYAETF Comparison
VS
Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. MCH's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. In contrast, CNYA's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. MCH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.6% for CNYA. MCH is down -2.89% year-to-date (YTD) with -$580K in YTD flows. CNYA performs better with 1.54% YTD performance, and -$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCH and CNYA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCH vs CNYA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCH CNYA | -2.95%-3.25% | -7.75%-7.30% | -2.89%+1.54% | -5.52%+5.13% | +37.43%+34.28% | n/a-8.25% |
| Flows | MCH CNYA | -$580K-$14M | -$580K-$18M | -$580K-$9M | -$1M-$19M | -$13M-$106M | --$263M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCH CNYA | +23.61%+23.11% | +22.57%+18.12% | +25.42%+19.32% | n/a+19.58% |
| Max drawdown | MCH CNYA | -9.58%-10.46% | -15.02%-10.46% | -23.38%-21.36% | n/a-44.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCH CNYA | 84d84d | 228d84d | 309d318d | n/a1737d |
Trading data
MCH | CNYA | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.71 | $34.59 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $27.65 | $34.68 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCH
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCH | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCH | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.71 | $34.59 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | -0.27% |
| AuM | $21.50 M | $206.14 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
MCH | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Matthews Asia | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI China A Inclusion Index |
| N° of holdings | 52 | 411 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 13, 2022 | June 13, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCH
China
88.38%
Other
11.62%
CNYA
China
99.71%
Other
0.29%
Sectors
MCH
Finance
27.26%
Technology
26.59%
Industrials
12.03%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.27%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.75%
Other
16.11%
CNYA
Technology
27.33%
Finance
20.07%
Industrials
16.38%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.77%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.63%
Other
14.82%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.79%
CNYA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.81%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
MCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
13.52%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
6.64%
Meituan
4.73%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
3.21%
China International Capital Corp. Ltd.
3.03%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
2.96%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
2.84%
JD.com, Inc.
2.80%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.78%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.74%
Jiangsu Zhongtian Technology Co., Ltd.
2.68%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
2.31%
China Merchants Securities Co., Ltd.
2.25%
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
2.17%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.12%
CNYA
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.75%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
3.61%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
2.04%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
1.76%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
1.51%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
1.42%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
1.41%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.31%
Agricultural Bank of China Ltd.
1.28%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.23%
Foxconn Industrial Internet Co., Ltd.
1.19%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.10%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
1.09%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.08%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.04%
Frequently asked questions about MCH and CNYA
How have the MCH and CNYA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, MCH is down -2.89% year-to-date (YTD), while CNYA has returned 1.54%. That puts CNYA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCH or CNYA?
Year-to-date, the MCH ETF saw -$580K in flows, compared to -$9M for CNYA.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCH or CNYA?
Over the past year, MCH had a volatility of 22.57%, while CNYA experienced 18.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCH or CNYA?
As of September 14, 2026, MCH holds $21.50 M in assets under management (AUM), while CNYA manages $206.14 M.
What sectors do the MCH and CNYA ETFs invest in?
MCH leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, CNYA focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MCH ETF and CNYA ETF?
MCH top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Meituan. CNYA holds in its top three: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd., Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd. and Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCH or CNYA?
MCH holds 53 securities with 56.79% of its assets in the top 15. CNYA has 411 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.81%.
Latest news about MCH & CNYA
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
CNYA
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
CNYA
Andrew Mattock - Matthews China Active ETF (MCH)
March 15, 2023
MCH
Exploring fresh dividend investing strategies and foreign stocks
September 17, 2022
MCH
Advertisement
