Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LSVDvsQDEFETF Comparison
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund ETF
LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund ETF (QDEF) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. LSVD's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. In contrast, QDEF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. LSVD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.38% for QDEF. LSVD is up 0.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$407K in YTD flows. QDEF performs better with 1.47% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LSVD and QDEF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LSVD vs QDEF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LSVD QDEF | -2.98%-2.47% | +0.45%+0.30% | +0.77%+1.47% | +27.41%+19.90% | n/a+72.98% | n/a+83.19% |
| Flows | LSVD QDEF | +$546K+$2M | +$452K+$4M | +$407K+$4M | +$508M+$26M | --$6M | --$181M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LSVD QDEF | +12.68%+9.48% | +18.48%+14.75% | n/a+12.10% | n/a+13.98% |
| Max drawdown | LSVD QDEF | -3.93%-2.56% | -14.20%-11.62% | n/a-14.47% | n/a-21.30% |
| Max drawdown duration | LSVD QDEF | 29d30d | 45d46d | n/a191d | n/a566d |
LSVD | QDEF | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:48 PM | $30.00 | $82.13 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $30.00 | $82.43 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LSVD | QDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LSVD | QDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.00 | $82.13 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -0.36% |
| AuM | $552.46 M | $502.84 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.38% |
LSVD | QDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | LSV Asset Management | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | - | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index |
| N° of holdings | 118 | 123 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 18, 2024 | December 14, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LSVD and QDEF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, LSVD is up 0.77% year-to-date (YTD), while QDEF has returned 1.47%. That puts QDEF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LSVD or QDEF?
Year-to-date, the LSVD ETF saw +$407K in flows, compared to +$4M for QDEF.
Which ETF is more volatile: LSVD or QDEF?
Over the past year, LSVD had a volatility of 18.48%, while QDEF experienced 14.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: LSVD or QDEF?
As of March 10, 2026, LSVD holds $552.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDEF manages $502.84 M.
What sectors do the LSVD and QDEF ETFs invest in?
LSVD leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. Meanwhile, QDEF focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the LSVD ETF and QDEF ETF?
LSVD top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. QDEF holds in its top three: APPLE, NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: LSVD or QDEF?
LSVD holds 119 securities with 42.35% of its assets in the top 15. QDEF has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.64%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
