LSGRvsIWYETF Comparison
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. In contrast, IWY's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. LSGR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.67%, versus 0.2% for IWY. LSGR is down -0.01% year-to-date (YTD) with +$228M in YTD flows. IWY performs better with 1.87% YTD performance, and -$1.10B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LSGR and IWY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LSGR vs IWY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LSGR IWY | -1.48%-4.66% | +9.60%+1.57% | -0.01%+1.87% | -0.18%+2.27% | +83.32%+85.10% | n/a+77.70% |
| Flows | LSGR IWY | -$41M+$548K | -$26M-$914M | +$228M-$1.10B | +$280M-$1.53B | +$733M+$1.58B | -+$4.27B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LSGR IWY | +16.86%+18.29% | +18.31%+18.40% | +20.56%+19.98% | n/a+22.04% |
| Max drawdown | LSGR IWY | -3.77%-7.36% | -18.15%-16.56% | -23.59%-23.25% | n/a-32.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | LSGR IWY | 39d17d | 360d190d | 153d192d | n/a715d |
LSGR | IWY | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.71 | $281.26 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $45.13 | $282.37 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LSGR | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LSGR | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.71 | $281.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.93% | -0.39% |
| AuM | $866.37 M | $15.40 B |
| E/R | 0.67% | 0.2% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
