LRGGvsSCHGETF Comparison
VS
Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. LRGG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, SCHG's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. LRGG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.04% for SCHG. LRGG is down -5.07% year-to-date (YTD) with -$69M in YTD flows. SCHG performs better with 3.21% YTD performance, and +$4.31B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LRGG and SCHG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LRGG vs SCHG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LRGG SCHG | +3.12%+0.30% | +0.54%+1.87% | -5.07%+3.21% | -5.63%+11.30% | n/a+78.51% | n/a+81.22% |
| Flows | LRGG SCHG | +$20M+$200M | +$33M+$3.30B | -$69M+$4.31B | +$18M+$7.11B | -+$19.41B | -+$22.96B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LRGG SCHG | +15.82%+16.19% | +14.81%+16.61% | n/a+19.81% | n/a+22.64% |
| Max drawdown | LRGG SCHG | -8.19%-7.55% | -18.94%-16.35% | n/a-23.41% | n/a-34.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | LRGG SCHG | 56d56d | 272d188d | n/a193d | n/a754d |
Trading data
LRGG | SCHG | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.39 | $33.72 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $28.06 | $33.58 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LRGG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLRGG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LRGG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.39 | $33.72 |
| 1D performance | +1.17% | +0.42% |
| AuM | $289.22 M | $58.80 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.04% |
Characteristics
LRGG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Nomura | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 21 | 187 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 15, 2024 | December 11, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LRGG
USA
88.28%
Other
11.72%
SCHG
USA
97.85%
Other
2.15%
Sectors
LRGG
Technology
58.15%
Finance
16.3%
Healthcare
8.93%
Other
16.63%
SCHG
Technology
56.26%
Healthcare
9.53%
Industrials
7.65%
Finance
7.46%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.16%
Other
11.94%
Advertisement
Diversification
LRGG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
87.78%
SCHG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
61.9%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
LRGG
NVIDIA Corp.
15.84%
Microsoft Corp.
9.37%
Apple, Inc.
8.45%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.78%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.66%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.53%
Visa, Inc.
5.11%
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
4.62%
Danaher Corp.
4.33%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
4.08%
Waste Connections, Inc.
4.02%
GE Aerospace
3.74%
S&P Global, Inc.
3.69%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.59%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
2.98%
SCHG
NVIDIA Corp.
10.62%
Apple, Inc.
9.48%
Microsoft Corp.
5.97%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.05%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.46%
Broadcom Inc.
3.98%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.58%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.12%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.87%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.70%
Tesla, Inc.
2.66%
Visa, Inc.
2.33%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.79%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.69%
GE Aerospace
1.61%
Frequently asked questions about LRGG and SCHG
How have the LRGG and SCHG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, LRGG is down -5.07% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHG has returned 3.21%. That puts SCHG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LRGG or SCHG?
Year-to-date, the LRGG ETF saw -$69M in flows, compared to +$4.31B for SCHG.
Which ETF is more volatile: LRGG or SCHG?
Over the past year, LRGG had a volatility of 14.81%, while SCHG experienced 16.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: LRGG or SCHG?
As of July 27, 2026, LRGG holds $289.22 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHG manages $58.80 B.
What sectors do the LRGG and SCHG ETFs invest in?
LRGG leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, SCHG focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the LRGG ETF and SCHG ETF?
LRGG top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Apple, Inc.. SCHG holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: LRGG or SCHG?
LRGG holds 21 securities with 87.78% of its assets in the top 15. SCHG has 189 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.9%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LRGG & SCHG
Advertisement
Advertisement
