LQDBvsVCLTETF Comparison
VS
iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) belongs to the Intl IG Bonds segment. Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) is part of the US Corporate IG Bonds segment. LQDB's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Telecommunications and Energy. In contrast, VCLT's top sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Healthcare. LQDB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.03% for VCLT. LQDB is down -1.32% year-to-date (YTD) with +$13M in YTD flows. VCLT performs worse with -4.06% YTD performance, and +$1.27B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LQDB and VCLT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LQDB vs VCLT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LQDB VCLT | -0.42%-1.02% | -1.83%-3.59% | -1.32%-4.06% | -1.60%-6.04% | +18.76%+16.27% | -0.28%-16.65% |
| Flows | LQDB VCLT | --$612M | --$536M | +$13M+$1.27B | +$17M+$1.05B | +$34M+$3.36B | -$3M+$5.63B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LQDB VCLT | +4.43%+8.65% | +4.04%+7.78% | +5.16%+9.72% | +6.48%+11.71% |
| Max drawdown | LQDB VCLT | -2.99%-6.08% | -4.02%-9.20% | -4.09%-9.55% | -21.40%-34.48% |
| Max drawdown duration | LQDB VCLT | 52d89d | 109d353d | 268d359d | 1436d1802d |
Trading data
LQDB | VCLT | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:46 PM | $82.89 | $69.47 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $82.93 | $69.80 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LQDB | VCLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:46 PM
Live
Closed
LQDB | VCLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $82.89 | $69.47 |
| 1D performance | -0.06% | -0.47% |
| AuM | $58.01 M | $8.14 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
LQDB | VCLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade BBB 0+ TRI | Bloomberg U.S. Long Term Corporate Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | 1760 | 2832 |
| Asset class | Fixed Income | Bonds |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 20, 2021 | November 19, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LQDB
USA
89.96%
Other
10.04%
VCLT
USA
89.62%
Other
10.38%
Sectors
LQDB
Finance
23.59%
Telecommunication.
11.02%
Energy
10.86%
Technology
9.97%
Healthcare
8.07%
Utilities
8.02%
Other
28.47%
VCLT
Finance
18.16%
Utilities
13.94%
Healthcare
12.14%
Technology
11.14%
Energy
8.97%
Telecommunication.
8.57%
Other
27.08%
Advertisement
Diversification
LQDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.35%
VCLT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
3.63%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
LQDB
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
4.45%
Shire US, 3.2% 23sep2026, USD
0.61%
Ford Motor Credit Co, 7.122% 7nov2033, USD
0.40%
Aercap Holdings, 6.15% 30sep2030, USD
0.39%
Ford Motor Credit Co, 5.918% 20mar2028, USD
0.35%
Santander UK Group Holdings, 6.534% 10jan2029, USD
0.35%
Nomura Holdings, 5.842% 18jan2028, USD
0.34%
Takeda Pharmaceutical, 5% 26nov2028, USD
0.34%
Barclays, 4.836% 9may2028, USD
0.34%
Takeda Pharmaceutical, 2.05% 31mar2030, USD
0.34%
Nomura Holdings, 2.608% 14jul2031, USD
0.31%
US161175CU68
0.30%
Deutsche Bank (New York Branch), 5.706% 8feb2028, USD (D)
0.29%
Verizon Communications, 2.55% 21mar2031, USD
0.28%
Deutsche Bank (New York Branch), 6.72% 18jan2029, USD
0.26%
VCLT
Anheuser-Busch, 4.9% 1feb2046, USD
0.36%
CVS Health, 5.05% 25mar2048, USD
0.32%
Meta Platforms, 5.625% 15nov2055, USD
0.28%
Boeing, 5.805% 1may2050, USD
0.26%
Amazon.com, 5.8% 13mar2056, USD
0.24%
Oracle, 6.7% 4feb2056, USD
0.23%
AT&T Inc, 3.5% 15sep2053, USD
0.23%
CVS Health, 4.78% 25mar2038, USD
0.23%
AT&T Inc, 3.55% 15sep2055, USD
0.23%
Goldman Sachs, 6.75% 1oct2037, USD
0.22%
Bank of America Corporation, 4.083% 20mar2051, USD (N)
0.21%
Amgen, 5.65% 2mar2053, USD
0.21%
Meta Platforms, 5.5% 15nov2045, USD
0.21%
AT&T Inc, 3.65% 15sep2059, USD
0.21%
Meta Platforms, 5.75% 15nov2065, USD
0.20%
Frequently asked questions about LQDB and VCLT
How have the LQDB and VCLT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, LQDB is down -1.32% year-to-date (YTD), while VCLT has lost -4.06%. That puts LQDB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LQDB or VCLT?
Year-to-date, the LQDB ETF saw +$13M in flows, compared to +$1.27B for VCLT.
Which ETF is more volatile: LQDB or VCLT?
Over the past year, LQDB had a volatility of 4.04%, while VCLT experienced 7.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: LQDB or VCLT?
As of October 16, 2026, LQDB holds $58.01 M in assets under management (AUM), while VCLT manages $8.14 B.
What sectors do the LQDB and VCLT ETFs invest in?
LQDB leans toward sectors like Finance, Telecommunications and Energy. Meanwhile, VCLT focuses on Finance, Utilities and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the LQDB ETF and VCLT ETF?
LQDB top holdings include BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury, Shire US, 3.2% 23sep2026, USD and Ford Motor Credit Co, 7.122% 7nov2033, USD. VCLT holds in its top three: Anheuser-Busch, 4.9% 1feb2046, USD, CVS Health, 5.05% 25mar2048, USD and Meta Platforms, 5.625% 15nov2055, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: LQDB or VCLT?
LQDB holds 1777 securities with 9.35% of its assets in the top 15. VCLT has 2858 securities and a top 15 weight of 3.63%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LQDB & VCLT
Advertisement
