LITPvsTANETF Comparison
VS
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LITP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Utilities and Non-Corporate. In contrast, TAN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. LITP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.7% for TAN. LITP is down -36.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. TAN performs better with -14.52% YTD performance, and +$109M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LITP and TAN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LITP vs TAN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LITP TAN | -24.30%-6.26% | -31.68%-22.52% | -36.94%-14.52% | -22.97%-12.13% | -35.00%-13.22% | n/a-51.73% |
| Flows | LITP TAN | --$2M | --$380M | +$5M+$109M | +$9M+$179M | +$28M-$119M | --$609M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LITP TAN | +37.16%+32.01% | +45.37%+34.70% | +41.82%+36.16% | n/a+36.22% |
| Max drawdown | LITP TAN | -37.88%-22.52% | -57.12%-43.09% | -63.32%-51.26% | n/a-73.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | LITP TAN | 52d92d | 161d138d | 794d756d | n/a1810d |
Trading data
LITP | TAN | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $7.47 | $41.31 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $7.51 | $41.85 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LITP | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LITP | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $7.47 | $41.31 |
| 1D performance | -0.51% | -1.29% |
| AuM | $27.58 M | $881.06 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.7% |
Characteristics
LITP | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Sprott ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index | MAC Global Solar Energy Stock Index |
| N° of holdings | 39 | 35 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | April 15, 2008 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LITP
Australia
41.9%
Canada
13.9%
China
12.75%
Chile
12.14%
USA
10.56%
Other
8.75%
TAN
USA
44.16%
Israel
20.64%
China
8.02%
Other
27.18%
Sectors
LITP
Non-Energy Materi.
96.34%
Other
3.66%
TAN
Industrials
45.18%
Utilities
33.33%
Technology
10.23%
Other
11.25%
Advertisement
Diversification
LITP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
86.28%
TAN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.93%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
LITP
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
12.14%
PLS Group Ltd.
10.96%
Albemarle Corp.
10.09%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
8.39%
Liontown Ltd.
6.64%
IGO Ltd.
5.79%
Tianqi Lithium Corp.
4.37%
Lithium Argentina AG
4.19%
Elevra Lithium Ltd.
4.09%
Lithium Americas Corp.
3.81%
Sigma Lithium Corp.
3.47%
Core Lithium Ltd.
3.43%
Vulcan Energy Resources Ltd.
3.39%
PMET Resources, Inc.
2.89%
Standard Lithium Ltd.
2.64%
TAN
First Solar, Inc.
9.83%
Nextpower, Inc.
9.19%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
7.18%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
6.75%
Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd.
4.53%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
4.50%
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
4.13%
Sunrun, Inc.
3.83%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
3.57%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
3.48%
Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente SA
3.34%
OY Nofar Energy Ltd.
3.20%
Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd.
2.98%
SMA Solar Technology AG
2.82%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
2.60%
Frequently asked questions about LITP and TAN
How have the LITP and TAN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, LITP is down -36.94% year-to-date (YTD), while TAN has lost -14.52%. That puts TAN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LITP or TAN?
Year-to-date, the LITP ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$109M for TAN.
Which ETF is more volatile: LITP or TAN?
Over the past year, LITP had a volatility of 45.37%, while TAN experienced 34.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: LITP or TAN?
As of October 15, 2026, LITP holds $27.58 M in assets under management (AUM), while TAN manages $881.06 M.
What sectors do the LITP and TAN ETFs invest in?
LITP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, TAN focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LITP ETF and TAN ETF?
LITP top holdings include Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, PLS Group Ltd. and Albemarle Corp.. TAN holds in its top three: First Solar, Inc., Nextpower, Inc. and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: LITP or TAN?
LITP holds 39 securities with 86.28% of its assets in the top 15. TAN has 35 securities and a top 15 weight of 71.93%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LITP & TAN
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
LITP
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
TAN
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
LITP
Advertisement
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
LITP
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
LITP
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
TAN
Sprott Launches Four New Lithium, Uranium and Copper Miners ETFs
February 15, 2023
LITP
Advertisement
