LITPvsICLNETF Comparison
VS
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LITP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Utilities and Non-Corporate. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. LITP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.38% for ICLN. LITP is down -2.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. ICLN performs better with 7.81% YTD performance, and +$107M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LITP and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LITP vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LITP ICLN | +17.21%-2.33% | -27.47%-23.58% | -2.75%+7.81% | +62.78%+25.27% | -13.72%+16.61% | n/a-20.20% |
| Flows | LITP ICLN | --$255M | -$4M-$416M | +$5M+$107M | +$13M+$233M | +$29M-$1.17B | --$2.04B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LITP ICLN | +44.84%+34.94% | +47.04%+28.80% | +41.62%+24.54% | n/a+26.56% |
| Max drawdown | LITP ICLN | -38.67%-26.78% | -44.08%-28.47% | -67.97%-31.13% | n/a-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | LITP ICLN | 92d92d | 118d93d | 853d631d | n/a1767d |
Trading data
LITP | ICLN | |
Last sale 9/4/2026 at 1:30 PM | $11.44 | $17.76 |
| Previous close 09/03/2026 | $11.74 | $17.63 |
| Consolidated volume 09/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LITP | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LITP | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $11.44 | $17.76 |
| 1D performance | -2.56% | +0.74% |
| AuM | $42.53 M | $2.06 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
LITP | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Sprott ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index |
| N° of holdings | 37 | 104 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | June 24, 2008 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LITP
Australia
39.51%
China
13.63%
Canada
13.19%
Chile
12.32%
USA
10.96%
Other
10.38%
ICLN
USA
36.76%
China
22.42%
Other
40.81%
Sectors
LITP
Non-Energy Materi.
94.57%
Other
5.43%
ICLN
Industrials
48.56%
Utilities
41.75%
Technology
7.31%
Other
2.39%
Advertisement
Diversification
LITP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
85.7%
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.72%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LITP
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
12.32%
Albemarle Corp.
10.52%
PLS Group Ltd.
9.90%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
9.02%
Liontown Ltd.
6.15%
IGO Ltd.
5.38%
Tianqi Lithium Corp.
4.61%
Lithium Argentina AG
4.44%
Elevra Lithium Ltd.
4.35%
Lithium Americas Corp.
4.23%
Vulcan Energy Resources Ltd.
3.77%
Sigma Lithium Corp.
3.24%
PMET Resources, Inc.
2.80%
Core Lithium Ltd.
2.55%
Standard Lithium Ltd.
2.42%
ICLN
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.92%
First Solar, Inc.
7.85%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.54%
Bloom Energy Corp.
6.96%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.56%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.65%
Equatorial SA
3.30%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.70%
EDP SA
2.68%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.46%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.35%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
2.22%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.00%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.91%
Ørsted A/S
1.62%
Frequently asked questions about LITP and ICLN
How have the LITP and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, LITP is down -2.75% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 7.81%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LITP or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the LITP ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$107M for ICLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: LITP or ICLN?
Over the past year, LITP had a volatility of 47.04%, while ICLN experienced 28.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: LITP or ICLN?
As of September 2, 2026, LITP holds $42.53 M in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.06 B.
What sectors do the LITP and ICLN ETFs invest in?
LITP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LITP ETF and ICLN ETF?
LITP top holdings include Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, Albemarle Corp. and PLS Group Ltd.. ICLN holds in its top three: China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., First Solar, Inc. and Nextpower, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LITP or ICLN?
LITP holds 39 securities with 85.7% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 104 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.72%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LITP & ICLN
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
LITP
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
ICLN
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
LITP
Advertisement
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
LITP
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
LITP
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
