LITPvsICLNETF Comparison
VS
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LITP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Utilities and Non-Corporate. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. LITP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.38% for ICLN. LITP is down -37.2% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. ICLN performs better with -0.52% YTD performance, and +$281M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LITP and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LITP vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LITP ICLN | -23.98%-8.38% | -29.03%-10.33% | -37.20%-0.52% | -19.76%-0.60% | -35.28%+23.73% | n/a-26.20% |
| Flows | LITP ICLN | -+$123M | --$134M | +$5M+$281M | +$11M+$388M | +$28M-$855M | --$1.96B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LITP ICLN | +36.45%+25.45% | +45.15%+29.32% | +41.79%+24.55% | n/a+26.58% |
| Max drawdown | LITP ICLN | -38.14%-12.31% | -57.30%-31.11% | -63.32%-31.13% | n/a-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | LITP ICLN | 53d90d | 162d139d | 794d631d | n/a1813d |
Trading data
LITP | ICLN | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $7.60 | $16.33 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $7.47 | $16.26 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LITP | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LITP | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $7.60 | $16.33 |
| 1D performance | +1.77% | +0.43% |
| AuM | $27.46 M | $2.06 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
LITP | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Sprott ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index |
| N° of holdings | 39 | 103 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | June 24, 2008 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LITP
Australia
41.9%
Canada
13.9%
China
12.75%
Chile
12.14%
USA
10.56%
Other
8.75%
ICLN
USA
35.79%
China
22.2%
Other
42.01%
Sectors
LITP
Non-Energy Materi.
96.34%
Other
3.66%
ICLN
Industrials
49.97%
Utilities
40.84%
Other
9.2%
Advertisement
Diversification
LITP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
86.28%
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.42%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
LITP
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
12.14%
PLS Group Ltd.
10.96%
Albemarle Corp.
10.09%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
8.39%
Liontown Ltd.
6.64%
IGO Ltd.
5.79%
Tianqi Lithium Corp.
4.37%
Lithium Argentina AG
4.19%
Elevra Lithium Ltd.
4.09%
Lithium Americas Corp.
3.81%
Sigma Lithium Corp.
3.47%
Core Lithium Ltd.
3.43%
Vulcan Energy Resources Ltd.
3.39%
PMET Resources, Inc.
2.89%
Standard Lithium Ltd.
2.64%
ICLN
First Solar, Inc.
7.87%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Bloom Energy Corp.
7.09%
Nextpower, Inc.
6.53%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
4.57%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.55%
Equatorial SA
3.13%
EDP SA
2.91%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.85%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.67%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.06%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
2.06%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.96%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
1.85%
Ørsted A/S
1.57%
Frequently asked questions about LITP and ICLN
How have the LITP and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, LITP is down -37.2% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has lost -0.52%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LITP or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the LITP ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$281M for ICLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: LITP or ICLN?
Over the past year, LITP had a volatility of 45.15%, while ICLN experienced 29.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: LITP or ICLN?
As of October 16, 2026, LITP holds $27.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.06 B.
What sectors do the LITP and ICLN ETFs invest in?
LITP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Industrials and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the LITP ETF and ICLN ETF?
LITP top holdings include Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, PLS Group Ltd. and Albemarle Corp.. ICLN holds in its top three: First Solar, Inc., China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd. and Bloom Energy Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: LITP or ICLN?
LITP holds 39 securities with 86.28% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 103 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.42%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LITP & ICLN
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
LITP
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
ICLN
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
LITP
Advertisement
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
LITP
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
LITP
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
