LITvsURAETF Comparison
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LIT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.69% for URA. LIT is down -4.33% year-to-date (YTD) with -$243M in YTD flows. URA performs worse with -16.57% YTD performance, and +$887M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LIT vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT URA | -9.39%-11.14% | -10.33%-11.85% | -4.33%-16.57% | +3.77%-26.44% | +30.31%+60.30% | -28.71%+57.02% |
| Flows | LIT URA | -$120M-$8M | -$183M+$52M | -$243M+$887M | -$206M+$1.65B | -$1.20B+$2.61B | -$1.85B+$3.52B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT URA | +21.44%+38.95% | +26.46%+44.25% | +26.32%+37.48% | +25.93%+36.73% |
| Max drawdown | LIT URA | -20.94%-29.44% | -32.24%-44.05% | -35.88%-44.05% | -64.51%-44.05% |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT URA | 64d61d | 169d272d | 617d272d | 1800d272d |
LIT | URA | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 6:33 PM | $62.51 | $36.27 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $62.63 | $35.86 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LIT | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LIT | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $62.51 | $36.27 |
| 1D performance | -0.19% | +1.14% |
| AuM | $1.18 B | $4.99 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.69% |
