LITvsURAETF Comparison
VS
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LIT's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. LIT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.69% for URA. LIT is up 5.29% year-to-date (YTD) with -$60M in YTD flows. URA performs worse with -6.62% YTD performance, and +$835M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LIT vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT URA | -13.70%-10.92% | -17.91%-27.83% | +5.29%-6.62% | +53.70%-0.34% | +8.01%+109.75% | -11.66%+149.57% |
| Flows | LIT URA | -$66M+$36M | -$110M-$23M | -$60M+$835M | -$59M+$1.86B | -$1.37B+$2.82B | -$1.12B+$3.90B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT URA | +29.75%+44.40% | +28.50%+44.75% | +26.41%+36.36% | +26.28%+37.49% |
| Max drawdown | LIT URA | -25.43%-33.01% | -25.43%-36.85% | -49.84%-36.85% | -64.51%-37.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT URA | 74d79d | 74d177d | 875d177d | 1705d738d |
Trading data
LIT | URA | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $68.63 | $40.32 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $67.81 | $39.89 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LIT | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LIT | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.63 | $40.32 |
| 1D performance | +1.21% | +1.08% |
| AuM | $1.49 B | $5.55 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.69% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LIT
China
33.64%
United Kingdom
20.11%
Japan
12.05%
USA
11.43%
Republic of Korea
10.17%
Australia
7.24%
Other
5.36%
URA
Canada
42.07%
USA
21.88%
Republic of Korea
13.99%
Australia
9.1%
Other
12.96%
Sectors
LIT
Non-Energy Materi.
50.33%
Industrials
20.56%
Technology
14.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.24%
Other
6.92%
URA
Energy
54.35%
Industrials
24.05%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.68%
Other
13.93%
Diversification
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.8%
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
LIT
Rio Tinto Plc
20.11%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
6.13%
TDK Corp.
5.92%
Albemarle Corp.
4.51%
Tesla, Inc.
4.50%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.34%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.69%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
3.62%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.04%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.94%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
2.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.73%
URA
Cameco Corp.
24.63%
Oklo, Inc.
6.72%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.14%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.32%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
4.81%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.73%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.75%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
3.62%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
3.06%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.98%
Denison Mines Corp.
2.95%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.87%
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd.
2.79%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Co., Ltd.
2.65%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
2.24%
Frequently asked questions about LIT and URA
How have the LIT and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, LIT is up 5.29% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has lost -6.62%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LIT or URA?
Year-to-date, the LIT ETF saw -$60M in flows, compared to +$835M for URA.
Which ETF is more volatile: LIT or URA?
Over the past year, LIT had a volatility of 28.5%, while URA experienced 44.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: LIT or URA?
As of July 24, 2026, LIT holds $1.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $5.55 B.
What sectors do the LIT and URA ETFs invest in?
LIT leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the LIT ETF and URA ETF?
LIT top holdings include Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp.. URA holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Oklo, Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: LIT or URA?
LIT holds 36 securities with 78.8% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LIT & URA
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
URA
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
Advertisement
