LITvsNLRETF Comparison
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. LIT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.52% for NLR. LIT is down -4.33% year-to-date (YTD) with -$243M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with -23.24% YTD performance, and +$761M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LIT vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT NLR | -9.39%-8.64% | -10.33%-13.58% | -4.33%-23.24% | +3.77%-33.69% | +30.31%+51.33% | -28.71%+89.88% |
| Flows | LIT NLR | -$120M-$90M | -$183M-$214M | -$243M+$761M | -$206M+$1.12B | -$1.20B+$3.84B | -$1.85B+$3.91B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT NLR | +21.44%+37.88% | +26.46%+38.80% | +26.32%+33.15% | +25.93%+28.15% |
| Max drawdown | LIT NLR | -20.94%-27.90% | -32.24%-44.30% | -35.88%-44.30% | -64.51%-44.30% |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT NLR | 64d61d | 169d272d | 617d272d | 1800d272d |
LIT | NLR | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 6:33 PM | $62.51 | $95.75 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $62.63 | $94.92 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LIT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LIT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $62.51 | $95.75 |
| 1D performance | -0.19% | +0.87% |
| AuM | $1.18 B | $3.19 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.52% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
