LITvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LIT's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. LIT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.52% for NLR. LIT is up 6.7% year-to-date (YTD) with -$64M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with -11.17% YTD performance, and +$976M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LIT vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT NLR | -10.65%-6.03% | -18.33%-25.06% | +6.70%-11.17% | +59.79%-4.97% | +9.25%+99.66% | -6.80%+136.02% |
| Flows | LIT NLR | -$66M-$79M | -$118M+$38M | -$64M+$976M | -$67M+$2.57B | -$1.35B+$4.09B | -$1.19B+$4.13B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT NLR | +29.62%+37.84% | +28.47%+38.09% | +26.42%+31.73% | +26.23%+26.94% |
| Max drawdown | LIT NLR | -25.43%-29.50% | -25.43%-35.69% | -49.84%-35.69% | -64.51%-35.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT NLR | 77d82d | 77d180d | 875d180d | 1708d180d |
Trading data
LIT | NLR | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $68.63 | $109.76 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $67.81 | $108.10 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LIT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LIT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.63 | $109.76 |
| 1D performance | +1.21% | +1.54% |
| AuM | $1.51 B | $3.91 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.52% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LIT
China
33.64%
United Kingdom
20.11%
Japan
12.05%
USA
11.43%
Republic of Korea
10.17%
Australia
7.24%
Other
5.36%
NLR
USA
51.95%
Canada
19.17%
Australia
7.33%
Other
21.56%
Sectors
LIT
Non-Energy Materi.
50.33%
Industrials
20.56%
Technology
14.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.24%
Other
6.92%
NLR
Energy
39.99%
Utilities
30.17%
Industrials
25.07%
Other
4.77%
Advertisement
Diversification
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.8%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
82.89%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
LIT
Rio Tinto Plc
20.11%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
6.13%
TDK Corp.
5.92%
Albemarle Corp.
4.51%
Tesla, Inc.
4.50%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.34%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.69%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
3.62%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.04%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.94%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
2.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.73%
NLR
Cameco Corp.
8.45%
Constellation Energy Corp.
8.31%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
7.12%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
6.52%
Fortum Oyj
5.61%
Oklo, Inc.
5.21%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
5.07%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.02%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.82%
Denison Mines Corp.
4.81%
Centrus Energy Corp.
4.77%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.65%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.33%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.28%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
3.92%
Frequently asked questions about LIT and NLR
How have the LIT and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, LIT is up 6.7% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has lost -11.17%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LIT or NLR?
Year-to-date, the LIT ETF saw -$64M in flows, compared to +$976M for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: LIT or NLR?
Over the past year, LIT had a volatility of 28.47%, while NLR experienced 38.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: LIT or NLR?
As of July 27, 2026, LIT holds $1.51 B in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $3.91 B.
What sectors do the LIT and NLR ETFs invest in?
LIT leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the LIT ETF and NLR ETF?
LIT top holdings include Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp.. NLR holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Constellation Energy Corp. and Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LIT or NLR?
LIT holds 36 securities with 78.8% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 82.89%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LIT & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
LIT
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
Advertisement
