LGLVvsOAKMETF Comparison
ETF 1
LGLV
State Street SPDR US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
This fund is part of
US Low Volatility
-0.26%
VS
State Street SPDR US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) belongs to the US Low Volatility segment. Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. LGLV's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, OAKM's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. LGLV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.64% for OAKM. LGLV is up 4.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$42M in YTD flows. OAKM performs better with 8.67% YTD performance, and +$138M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LGLV and OAKM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LGLV vs OAKM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/09/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LGLV OAKM | -3.40%-0.12% | +1.81%+9.09% | +4.84%+8.67% | +4.99%+17.31% | +39.71%n/a | +43.18%n/a |
| Flows | LGLV OAKM | +$15M+$21M | +$67M+$1M | +$42M+$138M | +$68M+$392M | +$158M- | +$362M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LGLV OAKM | +11.59%+13.55% | +10.12%+13.53% | +11.15%n/a | +13.11%n/a |
| Max drawdown | LGLV OAKM | -4.52%-4.09% | -6.79%-7.12% | -10.12%n/a | -17.49%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LGLV OAKM | 43d6d | 143d174d | 166dn/a | 713dn/a |
Trading data
LGLV | OAKM | |
Last sale 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $181.35 | $30.81 |
| Previous close 09/09/2026 | $182.18 | $30.82 |
| Consolidated volume 09/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OAKM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLGLV | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LGLV | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $181.35 | $30.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.46% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $1.20 B | $1.17 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.64% |
Characteristics
LGLV | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Oakmark Funds |
| Benchmark | SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 170 | 39 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 20, 2013 | December 2, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LGLV
USA
93.82%
Other
6.18%
OAKM
USA
91.9%
Other
8.1%
Sectors
LGLV
Finance
28.78%
Industrials
15.96%
Utilities
11.04%
Healthcare
7.22%
Other
37%
OAKM
Finance
40.01%
Healthcare
13.19%
Technology
11.69%
Other
35.11%
Advertisement
Diversification
LGLV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.32%
OAKM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.35%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LGLV
Welltower, Inc.
4.42%
Realty Income Corp.
1.83%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.39%
The Southern Co.
1.21%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
1.16%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.16%
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
1.13%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
1.04%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.04%
General Dynamics Corp.
1.03%
CME Group, Inc.
1.03%
Johnson & Johnson
0.99%
Visa, Inc.
0.99%
PepsiCo, Inc.
0.98%
Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.
0.95%
OAKM
Willis Towers Watson Plc
3.71%
Citigroup, Inc.
3.63%
Targa Resources Corp.
3.53%
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
3.53%
Airbnb, Inc.
3.46%
Bank of America Corp.
3.45%
Capital One Financial Corp.
3.44%
State Street Corp.
3.39%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
3.37%
Salesforce, Inc.
3.30%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.24%
Merck & Co., Inc.
3.15%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
3.10%
Corteva, Inc.
3.04%
Elevance Health, Inc.
3.01%
Frequently asked questions about LGLV and OAKM
How have the LGLV and OAKM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 9, 2026, LGLV is up 4.84% year-to-date (YTD), while OAKM has returned 8.67%. That puts OAKM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LGLV or OAKM?
Year-to-date, the LGLV ETF saw +$42M in flows, compared to +$138M for OAKM.
Which ETF is more volatile: LGLV or OAKM?
Over the past year, LGLV had a volatility of 10.12%, while OAKM experienced 13.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: LGLV or OAKM?
As of September 9, 2026, LGLV holds $1.20 B in assets under management (AUM), while OAKM manages $1.17 B.
What sectors do the LGLV and OAKM ETFs invest in?
LGLV leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Utilities. Meanwhile, OAKM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LGLV ETF and OAKM ETF?
LGLV top holdings include Welltower, Inc., Realty Income Corp. and Duke Energy Corp.. OAKM holds in its top three: Willis Towers Watson Plc, Citigroup, Inc. and Targa Resources Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: LGLV or OAKM?
LGLV holds 170 securities with 20.32% of its assets in the top 15. OAKM has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.35%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LGLV & OAKM
Advertisement
Advertisement
