LGHvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
+0.44%
HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF (LGH) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Moderate segment. Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) is part of the Alternatives segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. LGH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. LGH is up 6.05% year-to-date (YTD) with -$22M in YTD flows. QDPL performs better with 11.98% YTD performance, and +$261M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LGH and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LGH vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LGH QDPL | -1.22%-0.76% | +4.78%+3.46% | +6.05%+11.98% | +11.63%+16.50% | +67.38%+70.14% | +58.89%+75.84% |
| Flows | LGH QDPL | -+$47M | -$6M+$125M | -$22M+$261M | -$25M+$429M | +$73M+$1.34B | +$143M+$1.49B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LGH QDPL | +16.35%+10.82% | +16.72%+11.79% | +17.20%+13.58% | +16.87%+15.40% |
| Max drawdown | LGH QDPL | -4.90%-3.11% | -11.23%-8.32% | -18.42%-17.47% | -29.00%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | LGH QDPL | 16d19d | 120d70d | 206d126d | 806d704d |
Trading data
LGH | QDPL | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.31 | $45.83 |
| Previous close 09/11/2026 | $65.75 | $46.04 |
| Consolidated volume 09/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LGH | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LGH | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.31 | $45.83 |
| 1D performance | -0.67% | -0.46% |
| AuM | $591.66 M | $1.80 B |
| E/R | 1% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
LGH | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Howard Capital Management | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 417 | 505 |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 7, 2019 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LGH
USA
79.22%
Other
20.78%
QDPL
USA
95.95%
Other
4.05%
Sectors
LGH
Technology
38.57%
Finance
10.53%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.97%
Healthcare
7.01%
Other
35.92%
QDPL
Technology
40.67%
Finance
12.61%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.57%
Sovereign
8.26%
Healthcare
8.1%
Industrials
7.12%
Other
14.67%
Advertisement
Diversification
LGH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.75%
QDPL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.03%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LGH
US25459W8626
19.08%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.75%
Apple, Inc.
6.61%
Microsoft Corp.
4.85%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.78%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.86%
Broadcom Inc.
2.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.49%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.66%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.37%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.34%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.26%
Tesla, Inc.
1.22%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.99%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.95%
QDPL
NVIDIA Corp.
6.87%
Apple, Inc.
6.41%
Microsoft Corp.
4.88%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.75%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.95%
Broadcom Inc.
2.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.38%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.73%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.33%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.32%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.31%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.28%
Tesla, Inc.
1.24%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.10%
USA, Notes 3.5% 30sep2026, USD (BH-2026)
0.88%
Frequently asked questions about LGH and QDPL
How have the LGH and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, LGH is up 6.05% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 11.98%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LGH or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the LGH ETF saw -$22M in flows, compared to +$261M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: LGH or QDPL?
Over the past year, LGH had a volatility of 16.72%, while QDPL experienced 11.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: LGH or QDPL?
As of September 11, 2026, LGH holds $591.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.80 B.
What sectors do the LGH and QDPL ETFs invest in?
LGH leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, QDPL focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the LGH ETF and QDPL ETF?
LGH top holdings include US25459W8626, NVIDIA Corp. and Apple, Inc.. QDPL holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: LGH or QDPL?
LGH holds 418 securities with 57.75% of its assets in the top 15. QDPL has 508 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.03%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LGH & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
