LGCFvsOAKMETF Comparison
VS
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Energy and Health Care. LGCF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.64% for OAKM. LGCF is up 4.02% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1M in YTD flows. OAKM performs worse with -2.08% YTD performance, and +$133M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LGCF and OAKM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LGCF vs OAKM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LGCF OAKM | +0.41%-0.73% | +5.02%+2.47% | +4.02%-2.08% | +16.48%+11.74% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | LGCF OAKM | --$1M | -$1M-$15M | -$1M+$133M | -$380K+$491M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LGCF OAKM | +9.83%+11.98% | +11.07%+13.19% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | LGCF OAKM | -2.08%-4.08% | -4.94%-7.12% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LGCF OAKM | 11d59d | 79d161d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
LGCF | OAKM | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.43 | $27.75 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $35.60 | $27.85 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OAKM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLGCF | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LGCF | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.43 | $27.75 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -0.36% |
| AuM | $2.12 M | $1.05 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.64% |
Characteristics
LGCF | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Themes Management Company | Oakmark Funds |
| Benchmark | Solactive US Cash Flow Champions Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 75 | 36 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 13, 2023 | December 2, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LGCF
USA
94.44%
Other
5.56%
OAKM
USA
93.41%
Other
6.59%
Sectors
LGCF
Financials
36%
Energy
21.05%
Health Care
17.23%
Consumer Discreti.
7.84%
Other
17.88%
OAKM
Financials
30.31%
Energy
12.24%
Health Care
10.26%
Information Techn.
9.91%
Industrials
7.63%
Communication Ser.
7.26%
Other
22.39%
Advertisement
Diversification
LGCF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
51.09%
OAKM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
LGCF
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP
5.32%
JPMORGAN CHASE
5.27%
ABBVIE
4.51%
CHEVRON TEXACO
4.44%
EXXON
4.34%
AMERICAN EXPRESS
3.28%
QUALCOMM
3.05%
GILEAD SCIENCES
3.01%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
2.90%
PFIZER
2.89%
CONOCOPHILLIPS
2.85%
NEWMONT CORP
2.40%
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL
2.33%
CHUBB LTD
2.26%
PROGRESSIVE
2.24%
OAKM
CONOCOPHILLIPS
4.88%
STATE STREET
3.97%
TARGA RESOURCS
3.93%
CITIGROUP
3.76%
KEURIG DR PEPPER INC
3.53%
SALESFORCE INC
3.52%
PHILLIPS 66
3.43%
AIRBNB
3.38%
WILLIS TOWERS WATSON
3.37%
CORTEVA INC
3.29%
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE INC
3.27%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC
3.18%
BK OF AMERICA CO
3.17%
FISERV
2.98%
CHARLES SCHWAB
2.89%
Frequently asked questions about LGCF and OAKM
How have the LGCF and OAKM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, LGCF is up 4.02% year-to-date (YTD), while OAKM has lost -2.08%. That puts LGCF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LGCF or OAKM?
Year-to-date, the LGCF ETF saw -$1M in flows, compared to +$133M for OAKM.
Which ETF is more volatile: LGCF or OAKM?
Over the past year, LGCF had a volatility of 11.07%, while OAKM experienced 13.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: LGCF or OAKM?
As of June 18, 2026, LGCF holds $2.12 M in assets under management (AUM), while OAKM manages $1.05 B.
What sectors do the LGCF and OAKM ETFs invest in?
LGCF leans toward sectors like Financials, Energy and Health Care. Meanwhile, OAKM focuses on Financials, Energy and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the LGCF ETF and OAKM ETF?
LGCF top holdings include THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, JPMORGAN CHASE and ABBVIE. OAKM holds in its top three: CONOCOPHILLIPS, STATE STREET and TARGA RESOURCS.
Which ETF is more diversified: LGCF or OAKM?
LGCF holds 75 securities with 51.09% of its assets in the top 15. OAKM has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 52.56%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LGCF & OAKM
Advertisement
Advertisement
