LBAYvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.73%
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. LBAY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.2%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. LBAY is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7M in YTD flows. QDPL performs worse with 12.06% YTD performance, and +$300M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LBAY and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LBAY vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LBAY QDPL | +2.03%+1.34% | +5.38%+1.65% | +14.97%+12.06% | +14.59%+15.84% | +20.15%+73.85% | +36.89%+75.18% |
| Flows | LBAY QDPL | -$667K+$35M | -$1M+$119M | -$7M+$300M | -$8M+$420M | -$47M+$1.37B | +$18M+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LBAY QDPL | +17.23%+10.24% | +17.87%+11.68% | +14.45%+13.54% | +14.10%+15.34% |
| Max drawdown | LBAY QDPL | -12.62%-2.82% | -13.57%-8.32% | -14.73%-17.47% | -16.53%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | LBAY QDPL | 53d53d | 179d70d | 470d126d | 1122d704d |
Trading data
LBAY | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.06 | $45.95 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $26.47 | $46.38 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LBAY
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLBAY | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LBAY | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.06 | $45.95 |
| 1D performance | +2.21% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $17.60 M | $1.83 B |
| E/R | 1.2% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
LBAY | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Leatherback Asset Management | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 16, 2020 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LBAY
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
LBAY
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
LBAY
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
LBAY
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about LBAY and QDPL
How have the LBAY and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, LBAY is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 12.06%. That puts LBAY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LBAY or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the LBAY ETF saw -$7M in flows, compared to +$300M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: LBAY or QDPL?
Over the past year, LBAY had a volatility of 17.87%, while QDPL experienced 11.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: LBAY or QDPL?
As of October 16, 2026, LBAY holds $17.60 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.83 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about LBAY & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
