KWEBvsKPROETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
KPRO
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
+0.04%
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) belongs to the EM Awakening segment. KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. KWEB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 1.04% for KPRO. KWEB is down -21.72% year-to-date (YTD) with -$833M in YTD flows. KPRO performs better with -4.38% YTD performance, and +$709K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KWEB and KPRO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KWEB vs KPRO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KWEB KPRO | +10.46%+1.74% | -5.63%-0.96% | -21.72%-4.38% | -21.48%+0.17% | +0.02%n/a | -31.49%n/a |
| Flows | KWEB KPRO | -$103M-$0K | -$610M+$26K | -$833M+$709K | +$18M+$709K | +$1.27B- | +$7.03B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KWEB KPRO | +28.60%+7.79% | +24.82%+9.03% | +30.15%n/a | +40.33%n/a |
| Max drawdown | KWEB KPRO | -20.66%-4.67% | -42.02%-11.23% | -42.02%n/a | -63.46%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | KWEB KPRO | 78d75d | 298d295d | 298dn/a | 1784dn/a |
Trading data
KWEB | KPRO | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.31 | $27.04 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $27.00 | $26.99 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KPRO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKWEB | KPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KWEB | KPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.31 | $27.04 |
| 1D performance | +1.15% | +0.22% |
| AuM | $5.31 B | $3.36 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 1.04% |
Characteristics
KWEB | KPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | KraneShares | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | CSI Overseas China Internet Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 33 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2013 | February 8, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KWEB
China
81.9%
Ireland
7.92%
Other
10.18%
KPRO
China
65.36%
Other
34.64%
Sectors
KWEB
Technology
41.73%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
26.87%
Consumer Services
13.19%
Other
18.21%
KPRO
Technology
33.3%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
21.45%
Consumer Services
10.53%
Other
34.72%
Diversification
KWEB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.49%
KPRO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
61.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
KWEB
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.44%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
7.92%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.70%
NetEase, Inc.
6.97%
Meituan
6.83%
Baidu, Inc.
4.19%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
4.15%
Kuaishou Technology
4.08%
KE Holdings, Inc.
3.89%
JD.com, Inc.
3.88%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
3.69%
Bilibili, Inc.
3.65%
JD Health International, Inc.
3.50%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
3.39%
Kanzhun Ltd.
3.21%
KPRO
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
8.33%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
6.32%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
6.15%
NetEase, Inc.
5.56%
Meituan
5.45%
Baidu, Inc.
3.34%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.31%
Kuaishou Technology
3.26%
KE Holdings, Inc.
3.10%
JD.com, Inc.
3.10%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
2.95%
Bilibili, Inc.
2.91%
JD Health International, Inc.
2.79%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
2.71%
Kanzhun Ltd.
2.56%
Frequently asked questions about KWEB and KPRO
How have the KWEB and KPRO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, KWEB is down -21.72% year-to-date (YTD), while KPRO has lost -4.38%. That puts KPRO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KWEB or KPRO?
Year-to-date, the KWEB ETF saw -$833M in flows, compared to +$709K for KPRO.
Which ETF is more volatile: KWEB or KPRO?
Over the past year, KWEB had a volatility of 24.82%, while KPRO experienced 9.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: KWEB or KPRO?
As of July 27, 2026, KWEB holds $5.31 B in assets under management (AUM), while KPRO manages $3.36 M.
What sectors do the KWEB and KPRO ETFs invest in?
KWEB leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, KPRO focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services.
What are the top holdings of the KWEB ETF and KPRO ETF?
KWEB top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., PDD Holdings, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.. KPRO holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., PDD Holdings, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: KWEB or KPRO?
KWEB holds 33 securities with 77.49% of its assets in the top 15. KPRO has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.84%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KWEB & KPRO
U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets
December 18, 2025
KWEB
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
KWEB
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KWEB
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Generate Income With This China Internet Covered Call ETF
February 14, 2023
KWEB
Growth Potential of China ETFs
January 30, 2023
KWEB
Advertisement
