KWEBvsKPROETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
KPRO
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.16%
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Real Estate. KWEB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 1.04% for KPRO. KWEB is down -17.05% year-to-date (YTD) with -$223M in YTD flows. KPRO performs better with -3.45% YTD performance, and +$683K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KWEB and KPRO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KWEB vs KPRO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KWEB KPRO | +0.39%+0.37% | -20.95%-4.74% | -17.05%-3.45% | -5.74%+3.65% | +14.94%n/a | -56.39%n/a |
| Flows | KWEB KPRO | +$154M+$683K | -$580M+$683K | -$223M+$683K | +$1.55B+$683K | +$1.89B- | +$9.57B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KWEB KPRO | +24.49%+8.68% | +23.37%+8.60% | +30.39%n/a | +40.84%n/a |
| Max drawdown | KWEB KPRO | -23.73%-5.42% | -31.43%-8.87% | -31.43%n/a | -74.55%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | KWEB KPRO | 88d88d | 207d204d | 207dn/a | 1825dn/a |
Trading data
KWEB | KPRO | |
Last sale 4/29/2026 at 5:14 PM | $28.05 | $27.22 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $28.11 | $27.28 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KPRO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKWEB | KPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/29/2026 at 5:14 PM
Live
Closed
KWEB | KPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.05 | $27.22 |
| 1D performance | -0.21% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $6.39 B | $3.39 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 1.04% |
Characteristics
KWEB | KPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | KraneShares | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | CSI Overseas China Internet Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 24 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2013 | February 8, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KWEB
Cayman Islands
69.08%
USA
26.91%
Other
4.01%
KPRO
Cayman Islands
62.05%
USA
24.17%
Other
13.77%
Sectors
KWEB
Consumer Discreti.
43.77%
Communication Ser.
35.03%
Other
21.2%
KPRO
Consumer Discreti.
39.32%
Communication Ser.
31.47%
Other
29.21%
Advertisement
Diversification
KWEB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.36%
KPRO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.39%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS
10.09%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
8.93%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
8.78%
MEITUAN
7.36%
NETEASE INC
5.91%
JD.COM INC
4.91%
KE HOLDINGS
4.34%
BAIDU
4.28%
JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
4.01%
US35969L1089
3.59%
TRIP.COM GROUP
3.56%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
3.33%
US8740801043
3.24%
BILIBILI
3.17%
US48553T1060
2.86%
KPRO
TENCENT HOLDINGS
9.06%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
8.02%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
7.89%
MEITUAN
6.61%
NETEASE INC
5.31%
JD.COM INC
4.41%
KE HOLDINGS
3.90%
BAIDU
3.84%
JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
3.60%
US35969L1089
3.22%
TRIP.COM GROUP
3.20%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
2.99%
US8740801043
2.91%
BILIBILI
2.85%
US48553T1060
2.57%
Frequently asked questions about KWEB and KPRO
How have the KWEB and KPRO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, KWEB is down -17.05% year-to-date (YTD), while KPRO has lost -3.45%. That puts KPRO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KWEB or KPRO?
Year-to-date, the KWEB ETF saw -$223M in flows, compared to +$683K for KPRO.
Which ETF is more volatile: KWEB or KPRO?
Over the past year, KWEB had a volatility of 23.37%, while KPRO experienced 8.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: KWEB or KPRO?
As of April 27, 2026, KWEB holds $6.39 B in assets under management (AUM), while KPRO manages $3.39 M.
What sectors do the KWEB and KPRO ETFs invest in?
KWEB leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, KPRO focuses on Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the KWEB ETF and KPRO ETF?
KWEB top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PINDUODUO INC ADR. KPRO holds in its top three: TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PINDUODUO INC ADR.
Which ETF is more diversified: KWEB or KPRO?
KWEB holds 31 securities with 78.36% of its assets in the top 15. KPRO has 31 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.39%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KWEB & KPRO
U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets
December 18, 2025
KWEB
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
KWEB
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KWEB
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Generate Income With This China Internet Covered Call ETF
February 14, 2023
KWEB
Growth Potential of China ETFs
January 30, 2023
KWEB
Advertisement
