KWEBvsKBUFETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
KBUF
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
+0.4%
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Real Estate. KWEB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 1.01% for KBUF. KWEB is down -22.27% year-to-date (YTD) with -$334M in YTD flows. KBUF performs better with -12.46% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KWEB and KBUF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KWEB vs KBUF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/12/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KWEB KBUF | -8.68%-5.45% | -11.73%-7.52% | -22.27%-12.46% | -18.90%-6.62% | +6.73%n/a | -53.96%n/a |
| Flows | KWEB KBUF | -$418M+$3M | +$8M+$3M | -$334M+$3M | +$1.39B+$3M | +$2.30B- | +$8.77B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KWEB KBUF | +25.73%+16.56% | +23.37%+13.56% | +30.29%n/a | +40.79%n/a |
| Max drawdown | KWEB KBUF | -14.33%-8.65% | -35.22%-18.62% | -35.22%n/a | -71.82%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | KWEB KBUF | 88d88d | 253d250d | 253dn/a | 1809dn/a |
Trading data
KWEB | KBUF | |
Last sale 6/15/2026 at 6:30 PM | $26.68 | $26.77 |
| Previous close 06/12/2026 | $26.49 | $26.83 |
| Consolidated volume 06/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KBUF
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKWEB | KBUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/15/2026 at 6:30 PM
Live
Closed
KWEB | KBUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.68 | $26.77 |
| 1D performance | +0.70% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $5.81 B | $6.01 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 1.01% |
Characteristics
KWEB | KBUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | KraneShares | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | CSI Overseas China Internet Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 24 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2013 | February 8, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KWEB
Cayman Islands
69.53%
USA
26.66%
Other
3.81%
KBUF
Cayman Islands
65.11%
USA
24.96%
Other
9.93%
Sectors
KWEB
Consumer Discreti.
43.68%
Communication Ser.
34.66%
Other
21.66%
KBUF
Consumer Discreti.
40.9%
Communication Ser.
32.46%
Other
26.64%
Advertisement
Diversification
KWEB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
KBUF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.2%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS
9.62%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
9.33%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
8.58%
MEITUAN
7.28%
NETEASE INC
6.12%
JD.COM INC
4.98%
KE HOLDINGS
4.78%
BAIDU
4.74%
TRIP.COM GROUP
3.85%
JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
3.81%
US35969L1089
3.69%
US8740801043
3.32%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
3.12%
BILIBILI
3.08%
US48553T1060
2.94%
KBUF
TENCENT HOLDINGS
9.01%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
8.74%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
8.03%
MEITUAN
6.82%
NETEASE INC
5.73%
JD.COM INC
4.66%
KE HOLDINGS
4.48%
BAIDU
4.44%
TRIP.COM GROUP
3.61%
JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
3.57%
US35969L1089
3.46%
US8740801043
3.11%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
2.92%
BILIBILI
2.88%
US48553T1060
2.75%
Frequently asked questions about KWEB and KBUF
How have the KWEB and KBUF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 12, 2026, KWEB is down -22.27% year-to-date (YTD), while KBUF has lost -12.46%. That puts KBUF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KWEB or KBUF?
Year-to-date, the KWEB ETF saw -$334M in flows, compared to +$3M for KBUF.
Which ETF is more volatile: KWEB or KBUF?
Over the past year, KWEB had a volatility of 23.37%, while KBUF experienced 13.56%.
Which ETF is bigger: KWEB or KBUF?
As of June 12, 2026, KWEB holds $5.81 B in assets under management (AUM), while KBUF manages $6.01 M.
What sectors do the KWEB and KBUF ETFs invest in?
KWEB leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, KBUF focuses on Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the KWEB ETF and KBUF ETF?
KWEB top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PINDUODUO INC ADR. KBUF holds in its top three: TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PINDUODUO INC ADR.
Which ETF is more diversified: KWEB or KBUF?
KWEB holds 31 securities with 79.24% of its assets in the top 15. KBUF has 31 securities and a top 15 weight of 74.2%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KWEB & KBUF
U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets
December 18, 2025
KWEB
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
KWEB
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KWEB
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Generate Income With This China Internet Covered Call ETF
February 14, 2023
KWEB
Growth Potential of China ETFs
January 30, 2023
KWEB
Advertisement
