KWEBvsFXIETF Comparison
VS
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) belongs to the EM Awakening segment. iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) is part of the China Blended Cap segment. KWEB's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Real Estate. In contrast, FXI's top sector exposures are Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. KWEB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.73% for FXI. KWEB is down -18.21% year-to-date (YTD) with -$463M in YTD flows. FXI performs better with -8.74% YTD performance, and -$43M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KWEB and FXI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KWEB vs FXI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/06/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KWEB FXI | -7.06%-3.79% | -23.13%-10.85% | -18.21%-8.74% | +1.13%+18.14% | +3.39%+29.86% | -57.67%-16.05% |
| Flows | KWEB FXI | -$69M-$43M | -$445M-$43M | -$463M-$43M | -$45M-$1.45B | +$1.63B-$264M | +$9.92B+$3.62B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KWEB FXI | +23.58%+19.87% | +23.38%+19.89% | +30.41%+26.31% | +40.81%+29.71% |
| Max drawdown | KWEB FXI | -24.92%-14.09% | -31.43%-15.40% | -31.43%-28.82% | -74.92%-55.13% |
| Max drawdown duration | KWEB FXI | 82d68d | 186d187d | 186d420d | 1826d1808d |
Trading data
KWEB | FXI | |
Last sale 4/7/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.06 | $35.48 |
| Previous close 04/07/2026 | $28.14 | $35.55 |
| Consolidated volume 04/07/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KWEB | FXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/7/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KWEB | FXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.06 | $35.48 |
| 1D performance | -0.28% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $6.07 B | $5.81 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.73% |
Characteristics
KWEB | FXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | CSI Overseas China Internet Index | FTSE China 50 Index |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 45 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2013 | October 5, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KWEB
Cayman Islands
69.1%
USA
24.66%
Other
6.24%
FXI
China
51.1%
Cayman Islands
46.39%
Other
2.51%
Sectors
KWEB
Consumer Discreti.
41.97%
Communication Ser.
37.15%
Other
20.88%
FXI
Financials
32.96%
Consumer Discreti.
26.07%
Communication Ser.
15.97%
Other
25.01%
Advertisement
Diversification
KWEB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.79%
FXI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
68.92%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of February 28, 2026
KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS
9.63%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
9.57%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
7.93%
MEITUAN
6.42%
NETEASE INC
5.54%
BAIDU
4.47%
KE HOLDINGS
4.45%
JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
4.32%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
4.14%
JD.COM INC
4.04%
BILIBILI
3.67%
US35969L1089
3.61%
TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP ADR
3.50%
TRIP.COM GROUP
3.43%
US48553T1060
3.06%
FXI
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
8.70%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
7.79%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK
7.45%
XIAOMI CORP
6.47%
INDUSTRIAL COMMERC BK CHINA
4.90%
MEITUAN
4.57%
PING AN
4.46%
BYD
3.72%
BANK OF CHINA
3.55%
NETEASE INC
3.27%
ZIJIN MINING
2.95%
BAIDU
2.94%
JD.COM INC
2.93%
TRIP.COM GROUP
2.64%
CHINA LIFE
2.60%
Frequently asked questions about KWEB and FXI
How have the KWEB and FXI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 6, 2026, KWEB is down -18.21% year-to-date (YTD), while FXI has lost -8.74%. That puts FXI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KWEB or FXI?
Year-to-date, the KWEB ETF saw -$463M in flows, compared to -$43M for FXI.
Which ETF is more volatile: KWEB or FXI?
Over the past year, KWEB had a volatility of 23.38%, while FXI experienced 19.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: KWEB or FXI?
As of April 6, 2026, KWEB holds $6.07 B in assets under management (AUM), while FXI manages $5.81 B.
What sectors do the KWEB and FXI ETFs invest in?
KWEB leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, FXI focuses on Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the KWEB ETF and FXI ETF?
KWEB top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PINDUODUO INC ADR. FXI holds in its top three: ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD, TENCENT HOLDINGS and CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK.
Which ETF is more diversified: KWEB or FXI?
KWEB holds 29 securities with 77.79% of its assets in the top 15. FXI has 51 securities and a top 15 weight of 68.92%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KWEB & FXI
U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets
December 18, 2025
KWEB
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
KWEB
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KWEB
FXI
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in China's Comeback
May 31, 2024
KWEB
FXI
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Generate Income With This China Internet Covered Call ETF
February 14, 2023
KWEB
Growth Potential of China ETFs
January 30, 2023
KWEB
Advertisement
