KWEBvsEMQQETF Comparison
VS
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) belong to the same industry segment: EM Awakening. KWEB's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Real Estate. In contrast, EMQQ's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. KWEB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.86% for EMQQ. KWEB is down -22.27% year-to-date (YTD) with -$334M in YTD flows. EMQQ performs better with -21.29% YTD performance, and -$22M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KWEB and EMQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KWEB vs EMQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/12/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KWEB EMQQ | -8.68%-4.63% | -11.73%-6.67% | -22.27%-21.29% | -18.90%-19.12% | +6.73%+10.69% | -53.96%-45.88% |
| Flows | KWEB EMQQ | -$418M+$4K | +$8M-$10M | -$334M-$22M | +$1.39B-$21M | +$2.30B-$292M | +$8.77B-$680M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KWEB EMQQ | +25.73%+21.01% | +23.37%+17.60% | +30.29%+20.22% | +40.79%+28.08% |
| Max drawdown | KWEB EMQQ | -14.33%-11.92% | -35.22%-31.26% | -35.22%-31.26% | -71.82%-65.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | KWEB EMQQ | 88d54d | 253d268d | 253d268d | 1809d1809d |
Trading data
KWEB | EMQQ | |
Last sale 6/15/2026 at 6:30 PM | $26.68 | $32.27 |
| Previous close 06/12/2026 | $26.49 | $31.70 |
| Consolidated volume 06/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KWEB | EMQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/15/2026 at 6:30 PM
Live
Closed
KWEB | EMQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.68 | $32.27 |
| 1D performance | +0.70% | +1.80% |
| AuM | $5.81 B | $258.80 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.86% |
Characteristics
KWEB | EMQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Benchmark | CSI Overseas China Internet Index | EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 35 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2013 | November 12, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KWEB
Cayman Islands
69.53%
USA
26.66%
Other
3.81%
EMQQ
Cayman Islands
33.49%
USA
27.06%
Other
39.45%
Sectors
KWEB
Consumer Discreti.
43.68%
Communication Ser.
34.66%
Other
21.66%
EMQQ
Consumer Discreti.
42.5%
Communication Ser.
18.95%
Other
38.55%
Advertisement
Diversification
KWEB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
EMQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.74%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS
9.62%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
9.33%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
8.58%
MEITUAN
7.28%
NETEASE INC
6.12%
JD.COM INC
4.98%
KE HOLDINGS
4.78%
BAIDU
4.74%
TRIP.COM GROUP
3.85%
JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
3.81%
US35969L1089
3.69%
US8740801043
3.32%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
3.12%
BILIBILI
3.08%
US48553T1060
2.94%
EMQQ
MERCADOLIBRE
8.45%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
6.83%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
6.76%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
6.28%
US81141R1005
5.48%
MEITUAN
4.23%
NASPERS-N-
3.23%
COUPANG
3.20%
BAJAJ FINANCE
3.18%
JD.COM INC
3.16%
NETEASE INC
2.94%
BAIDU
2.63%
TRIP.COM GROUP
2.59%
NAVER CORP
2.51%
ZOMATO LTD
2.27%
Frequently asked questions about KWEB and EMQQ
How have the KWEB and EMQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 12, 2026, KWEB is down -22.27% year-to-date (YTD), while EMQQ has lost -21.29%. That puts EMQQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KWEB or EMQQ?
Year-to-date, the KWEB ETF saw -$334M in flows, compared to -$22M for EMQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: KWEB or EMQQ?
Over the past year, KWEB had a volatility of 23.37%, while EMQQ experienced 17.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: KWEB or EMQQ?
As of June 12, 2026, KWEB holds $5.81 B in assets under management (AUM), while EMQQ manages $258.80 M.
What sectors do the KWEB and EMQQ ETFs invest in?
KWEB leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, EMQQ focuses on Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the KWEB ETF and EMQQ ETF?
KWEB top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PINDUODUO INC ADR. EMQQ holds in its top three: MERCADOLIBRE, PINDUODUO INC ADR and ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD.
Which ETF is more diversified: KWEB or EMQQ?
KWEB holds 31 securities with 79.24% of its assets in the top 15. EMQQ has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.74%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KWEB & EMQQ
U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets
December 18, 2025
KWEB
Surprising emerging markets where opportunity abounds
July 17, 2025
EMQQ
Ask the Manager: Kevin Carter on Why India is the "Perfect Emerging Market"
February 13, 2025
EMQQ
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
KWEB
Advertisement
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KWEB
Advertisement
