Open Now: The Global ETF Survey Take the Survey →

Advertisement
Advertisement

KUREvsMCHIETF Comparison

ETF 1
KURE

KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF

This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
+0.69%
VS
ETF 2
MCHI

iShares MSCI China ETF

This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
+0.69%

KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. KURE's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, MCHI's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. KURE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.59% for MCHI. KURE is up 0.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22M in YTD flows. MCHI performs worse with -7.25% YTD performance, and -$895M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KURE and MCHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

KURE vs MCHI performance and flow charts

Performance

051015%Jun 30Jul 8Jul 15Jul 22Jul 29

Cumulative Flows

-100 M-50 M0 MJun 30Jul 8Jul 15Jul 22Jul 29

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
KURE
MCHI
+9.84%+8.67%
-0.46%-2.74%
+0.17%-7.25%
-10.50%-2.04%
-4.22%+20.54%
-47.23%-12.25%
Flows
KURE
MCHI
+$21M-$117M
+$17M-$243M
+$22M-$895M
-$896K-$551M
+$22M-$1.95B
-$25M+$2.76B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
KURE
MCHI
+31.73%+20.96%
+27.53%+19.88%
+26.47%+24.33%
+27.48%+28.26%
Max drawdown
KURE
MCHI
-16.96%-15.32%
-29.89%-23.40%
-31.17%-25.77%
-62.91%-51.17%
Max drawdown duration
KURE
MCHI
68d78d
325d301d
619d422d
1815d1787d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
KURE
MCHI
Last sale
7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
$17.28
$55.80
Previous close
07/30/2026
$17.27
$55.50
Consolidated volume
07/30/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
KURE
MCHI
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KURE
MCHI
Last price
$17.28
$55.80
1D performance
+0.06%
+0.54%
AuM$98.82 M$6.27 B
E/R0.79%0.59%
Characteristics
KURE
MCHI
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderKraneSharesiShares
BenchmarkMSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 IndexMSCI China Index
N° of holdings43524
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateJanuary 31, 2018March 29, 2011
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

KURE
China
86.22%
Switzerland
8.84%
Other
4.94%
MCHI
China
89.6%
Other
10.4%

Sectors

KURE
Healthcare
98.15%
Other
1.85%
MCHI
Technology
30.49%
Finance
20.69%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.94%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.16%
Other
27.73%
Advertisement

Diversification

KURE

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

65.95%
MCHI

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

45.56%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026
KURE
BeOne Medicines Ltd.
8.84%
Innovent Biologics, Inc.
8.80%
WuXi Biologics (Cayman), Inc.
7.51%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
5.79%
Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
4.59%
Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.
4.27%
Akeso, Inc.
3.72%
CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Ltd.
3.68%
Sino Biopharmaceutical Ltd.
3.39%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
3.35%
Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.
2.85%
3SBio, Inc.
2.49%
Yunnan Baiyao Group Co., Ltd.
2.30%
Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.
2.27%
Aier Eye Hospital Group Co., Ltd.
2.10%
MCHI
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
14.21%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.35%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.65%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.25%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.99%
NetEase, Inc.
1.91%
Meituan
1.85%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
1.82%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.80%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.79%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.43%
Baidu, Inc.
1.23%
JD.com, Inc.
1.22%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
1.07%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
0.98%
Frequently asked questions about KURE and MCHI

How have the KURE and MCHI ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 30, 2026, KURE is up 0.17% year-to-date (YTD), while MCHI has lost -7.25%. That puts KURE better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KURE or MCHI?

Year-to-date, the KURE ETF saw +$22M in flows, compared to -$895M for MCHI.

Which ETF is more volatile: KURE or MCHI?

Over the past year, KURE had a volatility of 27.53%, while MCHI experienced 19.88%.

Which ETF is bigger: KURE or MCHI?

As of July 30, 2026, KURE holds $98.82 M in assets under management (AUM), while MCHI manages $6.27 B.

What sectors do the KURE and MCHI ETFs invest in?

KURE leans toward sectors like Healthcare. Meanwhile, MCHI focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.

What are the top holdings of the KURE ETF and MCHI ETF?

KURE top holdings include BeOne Medicines Ltd., Innovent Biologics, Inc. and WuXi Biologics (Cayman), Inc.. MCHI holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: KURE or MCHI?

KURE holds 45 securities with 65.95% of its assets in the top 15. MCHI has 574 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.56%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up