KPROvsKWEBETF Comparison
ETF 1
KPRO
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.16%
VS
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Real Estate. KPRO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.04%, versus 0.7% for KWEB. KPRO is down -3.45% year-to-date (YTD) with +$683K in YTD flows. KWEB performs worse with -17.05% YTD performance, and -$223M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KPRO and KWEB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KPRO vs KWEB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KPRO KWEB | +0.37%+0.39% | -4.74%-20.95% | -3.45%-17.05% | +3.65%-5.74% | n/a+14.94% | n/a-56.39% |
| Flows | KPRO KWEB | +$683K+$154M | +$683K-$580M | +$683K-$223M | +$683K+$1.55B | -+$1.89B | -+$9.57B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KPRO KWEB | +8.68%+24.49% | +8.60%+23.37% | n/a+30.39% | n/a+40.84% |
| Max drawdown | KPRO KWEB | -5.42%-23.73% | -8.87%-31.43% | n/a-31.43% | n/a-74.55% |
| Max drawdown duration | KPRO KWEB | 88d88d | 204d207d | n/a207d | n/a1825d |
Trading data
KPRO | KWEB | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.22 | $28.03 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $27.28 | $28.11 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KPRO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKPRO | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KPRO | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.22 | $28.03 |
| 1D performance | -0.20% | -0.28% |
| AuM | $3.39 M | $6.39 B |
| E/R | 1.04% | 0.7% |
Characteristics
KPRO | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | - | CSI Overseas China Internet Index |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 24 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2024 | July 31, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KPRO
Cayman Islands
62.05%
USA
24.17%
Other
13.77%
KWEB
Cayman Islands
69.08%
USA
26.91%
Other
4.01%
Sectors
KPRO
Consumer Discreti.
39.32%
Communication Ser.
31.47%
Other
29.21%
KWEB
Consumer Discreti.
43.77%
Communication Ser.
35.03%
Other
21.2%
Advertisement
Diversification
KPRO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.39%
KWEB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.36%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
KPRO
TENCENT HOLDINGS
9.06%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
8.02%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
7.89%
MEITUAN
6.61%
NETEASE INC
5.31%
JD.COM INC
4.41%
KE HOLDINGS
3.90%
BAIDU
3.84%
JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
3.60%
US35969L1089
3.22%
TRIP.COM GROUP
3.20%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
2.99%
US8740801043
2.91%
BILIBILI
2.85%
US48553T1060
2.57%
KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS
10.09%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
8.93%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
8.78%
MEITUAN
7.36%
NETEASE INC
5.91%
JD.COM INC
4.91%
KE HOLDINGS
4.34%
BAIDU
4.28%
JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
4.01%
US35969L1089
3.59%
TRIP.COM GROUP
3.56%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
3.33%
US8740801043
3.24%
BILIBILI
3.17%
US48553T1060
2.86%
Frequently asked questions about KPRO and KWEB
How have the KPRO and KWEB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, KPRO is down -3.45% year-to-date (YTD), while KWEB has lost -17.05%. That puts KPRO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KPRO or KWEB?
Year-to-date, the KPRO ETF saw +$683K in flows, compared to -$223M for KWEB.
Which ETF is more volatile: KPRO or KWEB?
Over the past year, KPRO had a volatility of 8.6%, while KWEB experienced 23.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: KPRO or KWEB?
As of April 27, 2026, KPRO holds $3.39 M in assets under management (AUM), while KWEB manages $6.39 B.
What sectors do the KPRO and KWEB ETFs invest in?
KPRO leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, KWEB focuses on Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the KPRO ETF and KWEB ETF?
KPRO top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PINDUODUO INC ADR. KWEB holds in its top three: TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PINDUODUO INC ADR.
Which ETF is more diversified: KPRO or KWEB?
KPRO holds 31 securities with 70.39% of its assets in the top 15. KWEB has 31 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.36%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KPRO & KWEB
U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets
December 18, 2025
KWEB
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
KWEB
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KWEB
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Generate Income With This China Internet Covered Call ETF
February 14, 2023
KWEB
Growth Potential of China ETFs
January 30, 2023
KWEB
Advertisement
