KPROvsCQQQETF Comparison
ETF 1
KPRO
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.19%
VS
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) is part of the China Blended Cap segment. KPRO's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. In contrast, CQQQ's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. KPRO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1%, versus 0.65% for CQQQ. KPRO is down -6.37% year-to-date (YTD) with +$709K in YTD flows. CQQQ performs worse with -11.22% YTD performance, and +$283M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KPRO and CQQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KPRO vs CQQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KPRO CQQQ | -1.64%-10.62% | -1.53%-12.53% | -6.37%-11.22% | -8.06%-15.05% | n/a+25.47% | n/a-28.76% |
| Flows | KPRO CQQQ | -$1K-$199M | -$659K-$35M | +$709K+$283M | +$709K+$1.59B | -+$2.16B | -+$2.16B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KPRO CQQQ | +6.31%+29.84% | +8.99%+29.46% | n/a+29.57% | n/a+32.73% |
| Max drawdown | KPRO CQQQ | -3.91%-19.19% | -11.33%-24.05% | n/a-26.33% | n/a-61.50% |
| Max drawdown duration | KPRO CQQQ | 36d78d | 345d345d | n/a374d | n/a1760d |
Trading data
KPRO | CQQQ | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.36 | $46.27 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $26.38 | $46.18 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KPRO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKPRO | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KPRO | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.36 | $46.27 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | +0.19% |
| AuM | $3.29 M | $2.71 B |
| E/R | 1% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
KPRO | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 174 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2024 | December 8, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KPRO
China
74.31%
Ireland
7.25%
Other
18.44%
CQQQ
China
86.93%
Ireland
11.22%
Other
1.85%
Sectors
KPRO
Technology
35.81%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
24.89%
Consumer Services
12.98%
Other
26.32%
CQQQ
Technology
63.97%
Consumer Services
12.58%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.22%
Other
12.22%
Advertisement
Diversification
KPRO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.39%
CQQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
64.9%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
KPRO
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.01%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.57%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
7.25%
Meituan
7.20%
NetEase, Inc.
5.58%
JD.com, Inc.
3.87%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.79%
KE Holdings, Inc.
3.51%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
3.39%
Kuaishou Technology
3.35%
JD Health International, Inc.
3.28%
Kanzhun Ltd.
3.20%
Bilibili, Inc.
3.19%
Baidu, Inc.
3.16%
TAL Education Group
3.03%
CQQQ
Meituan
12.24%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
11.22%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.36%
Baidu, Inc.
8.03%
Kuaishou Technology
4.88%
Hua Hong Grace Semiconductor Ltd.
3.50%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.10%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.93%
Horizon Robotics
1.76%
SenseTime Group, Inc.
1.66%
Bilibili, Inc.
1.54%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.50%
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd.
1.46%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
1.42%
Kingboard Laminates Holdings Ltd.
1.31%
Frequently asked questions about KPRO and CQQQ
How have the KPRO and CQQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, KPRO is down -6.37% year-to-date (YTD), while CQQQ has lost -11.22%. That puts KPRO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KPRO or CQQQ?
Year-to-date, the KPRO ETF saw +$709K in flows, compared to +$283M for CQQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: KPRO or CQQQ?
Over the past year, KPRO had a volatility of 8.99%, while CQQQ experienced 29.46%.
Which ETF is bigger: KPRO or CQQQ?
As of September 15, 2026, KPRO holds $3.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while CQQQ manages $2.71 B.
What sectors do the KPRO and CQQQ ETFs invest in?
KPRO leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, CQQQ focuses on Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the KPRO ETF and CQQQ ETF?
KPRO top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and PDD Holdings, Inc.. CQQQ holds in its top three: Meituan, PDD Holdings, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: KPRO or CQQQ?
KPRO holds 33 securities with 70.39% of its assets in the top 15. CQQQ has 180 securities and a top 15 weight of 64.9%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KPRO & CQQQ
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
CQQQ
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
CQQQ
Advertisement
Advertisement
