Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
KONGvsQDEFETF Comparison
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund ETF
Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund ETF (QDEF) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. KONG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, QDEF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. KONG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.38% for QDEF. KONG is down -0.65% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. QDEF performs better with -0.2% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KONG and QDEF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KONG vs QDEF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KONG QDEF | -0.31%-2.64% | -1.09%-0.32% | -0.65%-0.20% | +6.92%+19.51% | +28.55%+70.13% | n/a+77.96% |
| Flows | KONG QDEF | -+$2M | -+$4M | -+$4M | -$1M+$26M | -$7M-$6M | --$178M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KONG QDEF | +11.42%+9.58% | +14.08%+14.77% | +11.47%+12.11% | n/a+13.98% |
| Max drawdown | KONG QDEF | -3.42%-4.16% | -10.00%-11.62% | -15.24%-14.47% | n/a-21.30% |
| Max drawdown duration | KONG QDEF | 45d32d | 45d46d | 315d191d | n/a566d |
KONG | QDEF | |
Last sale 3/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.25 | |
| Previous close 03/13/2026 | $80.72 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/13/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
KONG | QDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
KONG | QDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $81.25 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.65% |
| AuM | $21.96 M | $494.55 M |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.38% |
KONG | QDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Formidable | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | - | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index |
| N° of holdings | 34 | 123 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 21, 2021 | December 14, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the KONG and QDEF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, KONG is down -0.65% year-to-date (YTD), while QDEF has lost -0.2%. That puts QDEF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KONG or QDEF?
Year-to-date, the KONG ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$4M for QDEF.
Which ETF is more volatile: KONG or QDEF?
Over the past year, KONG had a volatility of 14.08%, while QDEF experienced 14.77%.
Which ETF is bigger: KONG or QDEF?
As of March 12, 2026, KONG holds $21.96 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDEF manages $494.55 M.
What sectors do the KONG and QDEF ETFs invest in?
KONG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, QDEF focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the KONG ETF and QDEF ETF?
KONG top holdings include META PLATFORMS, INTERACTIVE BROKERS GROUP and NVIDIA. QDEF holds in its top three: APPLE, NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: KONG or QDEF?
KONG holds 34 securities with 51.8% of its assets in the top 15. QDEF has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.64%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
