KLIPvsJEPQETF Comparison
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. KLIP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.94%, versus 0.35% for JEPQ. KLIP is down -14.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$715K in YTD flows. JEPQ performs better with 13% YTD performance, and +$10.32B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KLIP and JEPQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KLIP vs JEPQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KLIP JEPQ | -2.85%-0.82% | -6.95%+8.50% | -14.46%+13.00% | -18.33%+14.16% | +10.98%+81.35% | n/an/a |
| Flows | KLIP JEPQ | -$5M+$1.10B | -$5M+$3.40B | +$715K+$10.32B | +$12M+$11.42B | +$83M+$33.37B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KLIP JEPQ | +13.14%+14.12% | +15.72%+15.23% | +17.01%+15.77% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | KLIP JEPQ | -8.97%-4.67% | -21.36%-8.85% | -21.36%-20.17% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | KLIP JEPQ | 78d21d | 271d76d | 271d169d | n/an/a |
KLIP | JEPQ | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.72 | $59.38 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $21.13 | $60.06 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
KLIP | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.72 | $59.38 |
| 1D performance | -1.94% | -1.13% |
| AuM | $84.06 M | $44.22 B |
| E/R | 0.94% | 0.35% |
KLIP | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | KraneShares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 12, 2023 | May 3, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
