KLIPvsGPIQETF Comparison
ETF 1
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.21%
VS
ETF 2
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.21%
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. KLIP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.94%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. KLIP is down -15.37% year-to-date (YTD) with +$715K in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 15.82% YTD performance, and +$3.78B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KLIP and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KLIP vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KLIP GPIQ | -3.15%-2.24% | -8.62%+7.66% | -15.37%+15.82% | -19.13%+14.27% | +9.27%+94.09% | n/an/a |
| Flows | KLIP GPIQ | -$5M+$611M | -$5M+$1.42B | +$715K+$3.78B | +$12M+$4.39B | +$76M+$6.18B | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KLIP GPIQ | +13.12%+15.59% | +15.73%+17.34% | +17.00%+17.93% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | KLIP GPIQ | -9.85%-5.87% | -21.36%-9.57% | -21.36%-21.18% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | KLIP GPIQ | 80d23d | 273d75d | 273d124d | n/an/a |
Trading data
KLIP | GPIQ | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 3:22 PM | $20.73 | $54.59 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $20.62 | $56.07 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 3:22 PM
Live
Closed
KLIP | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.73 | $54.59 |
| 1D performance | +0.53% | -2.64% |
| AuM | $81.50 M | $6.52 B |
| E/R | 0.94% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
KLIP | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | KraneShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 12, 2023 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KLIP
Data will be available soon
GPIQ
Data will be available soon
Sectors
KLIP
Data will be available soon
GPIQ
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
KLIP
Data will be available soon
GPIQ
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
KLIP
Data will be available soon
GPIQ
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about KLIP and GPIQ
How have the KLIP and GPIQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, KLIP is down -15.37% year-to-date (YTD), while GPIQ has returned 15.82%. That puts GPIQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KLIP or GPIQ?
Year-to-date, the KLIP ETF saw +$715K in flows, compared to +$3.78B for GPIQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: KLIP or GPIQ?
Over the past year, KLIP had a volatility of 15.73%, while GPIQ experienced 17.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: KLIP or GPIQ?
As of October 29, 2026, KLIP holds $81.50 M in assets under management (AUM), while GPIQ manages $6.52 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about KLIP & GPIQ
ETF Comparison: NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Versus Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ)
September 3, 2026
GPIQ
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet & Covered Call Strategy ETF (NYSE Arca: KLIP)
February 25, 2023
KLIP
Advertisement
Generate Income With This China Internet Covered Call ETF
February 14, 2023
KLIP
Generate Income With This China Internet Covered Call ETF
February 14, 2023
KLIP
Advertisement
