KJULvsGPIQETF Comparison
ETF 1
KJUL
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - July
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.88%
VS
ETF 2
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.88%
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. KJUL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. KJUL is up 1.89% year-to-date (YTD) with +$70M in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 14.8% YTD performance, and +$3.58B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KJUL and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KJUL vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KJUL GPIQ | -2.61%+0.59% | -4.11%+0.55% | +1.89%+14.80% | +4.05%+18.72% | +31.03%n/a | +22.24%n/a |
| Flows | KJUL GPIQ | +$2M+$613M | +$92M+$1.40B | +$70M+$3.58B | +$64M+$4.28B | -$3M- | +$126M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KJUL GPIQ | +9.02%+15.72% | +7.95%+17.09% | +11.13%n/a | +12.53%n/a |
| Max drawdown | KJUL GPIQ | -6.04%-6.23% | -6.04%-9.57% | -14.47%n/a | -16.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | KJUL GPIQ | 61d13d | 61d75d | 260dn/a | 775dn/a |
Trading data
KJUL | GPIQ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.43 | $55.55 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $32.73 | $56.84 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KJUL | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.43 | $55.55 |
| 1D performance | -0.90% | -2.27% |
| AuM | $224.52 M | $6.27 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
KJUL | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 1, 2020 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KJUL
Data will be available soon
GPIQ
Data will be available soon
Sectors
KJUL
Data will be available soon
GPIQ
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
KJUL
Data will be available soon
GPIQ
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
KJUL
Data will be available soon
GPIQ
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about KJUL and GPIQ
How have the KJUL and GPIQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, KJUL is up 1.89% year-to-date (YTD), while GPIQ has returned 14.8%. That puts GPIQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KJUL or GPIQ?
Year-to-date, the KJUL ETF saw +$70M in flows, compared to +$3.58B for GPIQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: KJUL or GPIQ?
Over the past year, KJUL had a volatility of 7.95%, while GPIQ experienced 17.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: KJUL or GPIQ?
As of October 16, 2026, KJUL holds $224.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while GPIQ manages $6.27 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about KJUL & GPIQ
Advertisement
Advertisement
