Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
KBWPvsIYFETF Comparison
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) belong to the same industry segment: US Financials. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Financials. KBWP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.38% for IYF. KBWP is down -5.21% year-to-date (YTD) with -$15M in YTD flows. IYF performs worse with -9.92% YTD performance, and -$301M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KBWP and IYF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KBWP vs IYF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KBWP IYF | -1.81%-5.90% | -4.20%-9.94% | -5.21%-9.92% | +4.58%+8.71% | +55.17%+74.82% | +75.37%+64.62% |
| Flows | KBWP IYF | -$9M-$373M | -$143M-$255M | -$15M-$301M | -$133M-$328M | -$220M+$416M | -$91M+$632M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KBWP IYF | +16.22%+16.99% | +19.38%+19.74% | +17.82%+17.33% | +18.41%+19.01% |
| Max drawdown | KBWP IYF | -6.07%-12.68% | -11.39%-13.63% | -12.30%-16.50% | -16.98%-25.09% |
| Max drawdown duration | KBWP IYF | 72d65d | 45d45d | 123d125d | 235d747d |
KBWP | IYF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $121.02 | $116.08 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $120.65 | $116.10 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
KBWP | IYF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
KBWP | IYF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $121.02 | $116.08 |
| 1D performance | +0.31% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $262.85 M | $3.47 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.38% |
KBWP | IYF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty Index | Russell 1000 Financials 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 134 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 2, 2010 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the KBWP and IYF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, KBWP is down -5.21% year-to-date (YTD), while IYF has lost -9.92%. That puts KBWP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KBWP or IYF?
Year-to-date, the KBWP ETF saw -$15M in flows, compared to -$301M for IYF.
Which ETF is more volatile: KBWP or IYF?
Over the past year, KBWP had a volatility of 19.38%, while IYF experienced 19.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: KBWP or IYF?
As of March 12, 2026, KBWP holds $262.85 M in assets under management (AUM), while IYF manages $3.47 B.
What sectors do the KBWP and IYF ETFs invest in?
KBWP leans toward sectors like Financials. Meanwhile, IYF focuses on Financials.
What are the top holdings of the KBWP ETF and IYF ETF?
KBWP top holdings include CHUBB LTD, MARSH AND MCLENNAN and TRAVELERS COS INC/THE. IYF holds in its top three: BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, JPMORGAN CHASE and BK OF AMERICA CO.
Which ETF is more diversified: KBWP or IYF?
KBWP holds 24 securities with 79.73% of its assets in the top 15. IYF has 142 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.27%.
Insurance Investments Unveiled: Trends, ETFs, and the Changing Risk Landscape
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
