KBUFvsKWEBETF Comparison
ETF 1
KBUF
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
+1%
VS
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Real Estate. KBUF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.01%, versus 0.7% for KWEB. KBUF is down -12.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. KWEB performs worse with -22.27% YTD performance, and -$334M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KBUF and KWEB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KBUF vs KWEB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/12/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KBUF KWEB | -5.45%-8.68% | -7.52%-11.73% | -12.46%-22.27% | -6.62%-18.90% | n/a+6.73% | n/a-53.96% |
| Flows | KBUF KWEB | +$3M-$418M | +$3M+$8M | +$3M-$334M | +$3M+$1.39B | -+$2.30B | -+$8.77B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KBUF KWEB | +16.56%+25.73% | +13.56%+23.37% | n/a+30.29% | n/a+40.79% |
| Max drawdown | KBUF KWEB | -8.65%-14.33% | -18.62%-35.22% | n/a-35.22% | n/a-71.82% |
| Max drawdown duration | KBUF KWEB | 88d88d | 250d253d | n/a253d | n/a1809d |
Trading data
KBUF | KWEB | |
Last sale 6/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.78 | $26.62 |
| Previous close 06/15/2026 | $26.77 | $26.49 |
| Consolidated volume 06/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KBUF
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKBUF | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KBUF | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.78 | $26.62 |
| 1D performance | +0.02% | +0.49% |
| AuM | $6.01 M | $5.81 B |
| E/R | 1.01% | 0.7% |
Characteristics
KBUF | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | - | CSI Overseas China Internet Index |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 24 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2024 | July 31, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KBUF
Cayman Islands
65.11%
USA
24.96%
Other
9.93%
KWEB
Cayman Islands
69.53%
USA
26.66%
Other
3.81%
Sectors
KBUF
Consumer Discreti.
40.9%
Communication Ser.
32.46%
Other
26.64%
KWEB
Consumer Discreti.
43.68%
Communication Ser.
34.66%
Other
21.66%
Advertisement
Diversification
KBUF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.2%
KWEB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
KBUF
TENCENT HOLDINGS
9.01%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
8.74%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
8.03%
MEITUAN
6.82%
NETEASE INC
5.73%
JD.COM INC
4.66%
KE HOLDINGS
4.48%
BAIDU
4.44%
TRIP.COM GROUP
3.61%
JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
3.57%
US35969L1089
3.46%
US8740801043
3.11%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
2.92%
BILIBILI
2.88%
US48553T1060
2.75%
KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS
9.62%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
9.33%
PINDUODUO INC ADR
8.58%
MEITUAN
7.28%
NETEASE INC
6.12%
JD.COM INC
4.98%
KE HOLDINGS
4.78%
BAIDU
4.74%
TRIP.COM GROUP
3.85%
JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
3.81%
US35969L1089
3.69%
US8740801043
3.32%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY
3.12%
BILIBILI
3.08%
US48553T1060
2.94%
Frequently asked questions about KBUF and KWEB
How have the KBUF and KWEB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 12, 2026, KBUF is down -12.46% year-to-date (YTD), while KWEB has lost -22.27%. That puts KBUF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KBUF or KWEB?
Year-to-date, the KBUF ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to -$334M for KWEB.
Which ETF is more volatile: KBUF or KWEB?
Over the past year, KBUF had a volatility of 13.56%, while KWEB experienced 23.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: KBUF or KWEB?
As of June 12, 2026, KBUF holds $6.01 M in assets under management (AUM), while KWEB manages $5.81 B.
What sectors do the KBUF and KWEB ETFs invest in?
KBUF leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, KWEB focuses on Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the KBUF ETF and KWEB ETF?
KBUF top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PINDUODUO INC ADR. KWEB holds in its top three: TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and PINDUODUO INC ADR.
Which ETF is more diversified: KBUF or KWEB?
KBUF holds 31 securities with 74.2% of its assets in the top 15. KWEB has 31 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KBUF & KWEB
U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets
December 18, 2025
KWEB
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
KWEB
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KWEB
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Generate Income With This China Internet Covered Call ETF
February 14, 2023
KWEB
Growth Potential of China ETFs
January 30, 2023
KWEB
Advertisement
