KBUFvsKWEBETF Comparison
ETF 1
KBUF
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.3%
VS
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is part of the EM Awakening segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. KBUF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.97%, versus 0.69% for KWEB. KBUF is down -16.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. KWEB performs worse with -27.9% YTD performance, and -$1.01B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KBUF and KWEB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KBUF vs KWEB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KBUF KWEB | -6.17%-12.50% | -4.77%-6.19% | -16.30%-27.90% | -18.43%-34.69% | n/a-2.23% | n/a-41.86% |
| Flows | KBUF KWEB | +$2K-$180M | +$631K-$812M | +$3M-$1.01B | +$3M-$635M | -+$753M | -+$3.55B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KBUF KWEB | +12.08%+27.20% | +13.84%+24.90% | n/a+29.86% | n/a+39.59% |
| Max drawdown | KBUF KWEB | -8.40%-14.53% | -21.92%-42.02% | n/a-42.02% | n/a-62.67% |
| Max drawdown duration | KBUF KWEB | 32d32d | 341d344d | n/a344d | n/a1787d |
Trading data
KBUF | KWEB | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.64 | $24.48 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $25.62 | $24.73 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KBUF
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKBUF | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KBUF | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.64 | $24.48 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | -1.01% |
| AuM | $6.38 M | $4.71 B |
| E/R | 0.97% | 0.69% |
Characteristics
KBUF | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | - | CSI Overseas China Internet Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 33 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2024 | July 31, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KBUF
China
77.26%
Ireland
7.53%
Other
15.2%
KWEB
China
82.14%
Ireland
8.01%
Other
9.85%
Sectors
KBUF
Technology
37.23%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
25.88%
Consumer Services
13.5%
Other
23.4%
KWEB
Technology
39.58%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
27.51%
Consumer Services
14.35%
Other
18.56%
Advertisement
Diversification
KBUF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.19%
KWEB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.81%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
KBUF
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.37%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.87%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
7.53%
Meituan
7.49%
NetEase, Inc.
5.80%
JD.com, Inc.
4.03%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.94%
KE Holdings, Inc.
3.65%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
3.53%
Kuaishou Technology
3.48%
JD Health International, Inc.
3.41%
Kanzhun Ltd.
3.33%
Bilibili, Inc.
3.32%
Baidu, Inc.
3.28%
TAL Education Group
3.15%
KWEB
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.96%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.37%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
8.01%
Meituan
7.96%
NetEase, Inc.
6.17%
JD.com, Inc.
4.28%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
4.19%
KE Holdings, Inc.
3.88%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
3.75%
Kuaishou Technology
3.70%
JD Health International, Inc.
3.63%
Kanzhun Ltd.
3.54%
Bilibili, Inc.
3.53%
Baidu, Inc.
3.49%
TAL Education Group
3.35%
Frequently asked questions about KBUF and KWEB
How have the KBUF and KWEB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, KBUF is down -16.3% year-to-date (YTD), while KWEB has lost -27.9%. That puts KBUF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KBUF or KWEB?
Year-to-date, the KBUF ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to -$1.01B for KWEB.
Which ETF is more volatile: KBUF or KWEB?
Over the past year, KBUF had a volatility of 13.84%, while KWEB experienced 24.9%.
Which ETF is bigger: KBUF or KWEB?
As of September 11, 2026, KBUF holds $6.38 M in assets under management (AUM), while KWEB manages $4.71 B.
What sectors do the KBUF and KWEB ETFs invest in?
KBUF leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, KWEB focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services.
What are the top holdings of the KBUF ETF and KWEB ETF?
KBUF top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and PDD Holdings, Inc.. KWEB holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and PDD Holdings, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: KBUF or KWEB?
KBUF holds 33 securities with 73.19% of its assets in the top 15. KWEB has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.81%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KBUF & KWEB
U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets
December 18, 2025
KWEB
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
KWEB
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KWEB
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
KWEB
Generate Income With This China Internet Covered Call ETF
February 14, 2023
KWEB
Growth Potential of China ETFs
January 30, 2023
KWEB
Advertisement
