KBUFvsCQQQETF Comparison
ETF 1
KBUF
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.3%
VS
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) is part of the China Blended Cap segment. KBUF's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. In contrast, CQQQ's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. KBUF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.97%, versus 0.65% for CQQQ. KBUF is down -16.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. CQQQ performs better with -11.22% YTD performance, and +$387M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KBUF and CQQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KBUF vs CQQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KBUF CQQQ | -6.17%-8.84% | -4.77%-13.69% | -16.30%-11.22% | -18.43%-13.85% | n/a+23.86% | n/a-31.50% |
| Flows | KBUF CQQQ | +$2K-$95M | +$631K+$69M | +$3M+$387M | +$3M+$1.69B | -+$2.26B | -+$2.26B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KBUF CQQQ | +12.08%+30.15% | +13.84%+29.56% | n/a+29.58% | n/a+32.75% |
| Max drawdown | KBUF CQQQ | -8.40%-19.12% | -21.92%-24.05% | n/a-27.28% | n/a-61.50% |
| Max drawdown duration | KBUF CQQQ | 32d76d | 341d343d | n/a378d | n/a1758d |
Trading data
KBUF | CQQQ | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.58 | $46.11 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $25.64 | $46.16 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KBUF
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKBUF | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KBUF | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.58 | $46.11 |
| 1D performance | -0.25% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $6.38 M | $2.81 B |
| E/R | 0.97% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
KBUF | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 174 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2024 | December 8, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KBUF
China
77.26%
Ireland
7.53%
Other
15.2%
CQQQ
China
86.93%
Ireland
11.22%
Other
1.85%
Sectors
KBUF
Technology
37.23%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
25.88%
Consumer Services
13.5%
Other
23.4%
CQQQ
Technology
63.97%
Consumer Services
12.58%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.22%
Other
12.22%
Advertisement
Diversification
KBUF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.19%
CQQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
64.9%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
KBUF
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.37%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.87%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
7.53%
Meituan
7.49%
NetEase, Inc.
5.80%
JD.com, Inc.
4.03%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.94%
KE Holdings, Inc.
3.65%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
3.53%
Kuaishou Technology
3.48%
JD Health International, Inc.
3.41%
Kanzhun Ltd.
3.33%
Bilibili, Inc.
3.32%
Baidu, Inc.
3.28%
TAL Education Group
3.15%
CQQQ
Meituan
12.24%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
11.22%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.36%
Baidu, Inc.
8.03%
Kuaishou Technology
4.88%
Hua Hong Grace Semiconductor Ltd.
3.50%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.10%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.93%
Horizon Robotics
1.76%
SenseTime Group, Inc.
1.66%
Bilibili, Inc.
1.54%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.50%
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd.
1.46%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
1.42%
Kingboard Laminates Holdings Ltd.
1.31%
Frequently asked questions about KBUF and CQQQ
How have the KBUF and CQQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, KBUF is down -16.3% year-to-date (YTD), while CQQQ has lost -11.22%. That puts CQQQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KBUF or CQQQ?
Year-to-date, the KBUF ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$387M for CQQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: KBUF or CQQQ?
Over the past year, KBUF had a volatility of 13.84%, while CQQQ experienced 29.56%.
Which ETF is bigger: KBUF or CQQQ?
As of September 11, 2026, KBUF holds $6.38 M in assets under management (AUM), while CQQQ manages $2.81 B.
What sectors do the KBUF and CQQQ ETFs invest in?
KBUF leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, CQQQ focuses on Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the KBUF ETF and CQQQ ETF?
KBUF top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and PDD Holdings, Inc.. CQQQ holds in its top three: Meituan, PDD Holdings, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: KBUF or CQQQ?
KBUF holds 33 securities with 73.19% of its assets in the top 15. CQQQ has 180 securities and a top 15 weight of 64.9%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KBUF & CQQQ
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
February 19, 2024
CQQQ
China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis
February 5, 2024
CQQQ
Advertisement
Advertisement
