Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JREvsFRELETF Comparison
Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF (JRE) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) belong to the same industry segment: US Real Estate. JRE's top 3 sector exposures are Real Estate and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FREL's top sector exposures are Real Estate and Industrials. JRE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.08% for FREL. JRE is up 9.07% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. FREL performs worse with 5.65% YTD performance, and +$264M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JRE and FREL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JRE vs FREL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JRE FREL | +1.19%-0.36% | +9.66%+5.83% | +9.07%+5.65% | +12.06%+6.16% | +31.79%+30.55% | n/a+25.96% |
| Flows | JRE FREL | -+$35M | -+$276M | -+$264M | -$22M+$369M | -$4M+$43M | -+$163M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JRE FREL | +11.61%+11.75% | +16.56%+16.37% | +16.73%+17.19% | n/a+18.86% |
| Max drawdown | JRE FREL | -3.38%-3.47% | -12.61%-12.43% | -18.38%-17.46% | n/a-34.35% |
| Max drawdown duration | JRE FREL | 17d21d | 43d79d | 140d441d | n/a1528d |
JRE | FREL | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.98 | $27.92 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $25.11 | $28.11 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JRE | FREL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JRE | FREL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.98 | $27.92 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.68% |
| AuM | $3.81 M | $1.41 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.08% |
JRE | FREL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Janus Henderson Investors | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI USA IMI Real Estate 25/25 Index |
| N° of holdings | 22 | 116 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2021 | February 2, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JRE and FREL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, JRE is up 9.07% year-to-date (YTD), while FREL has returned 5.65%. That puts JRE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JRE or FREL?
Year-to-date, the JRE ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$264M for FREL.
Which ETF is more volatile: JRE or FREL?
Over the past year, JRE had a volatility of 16.56%, while FREL experienced 16.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: JRE or FREL?
As of March 10, 2026, JRE holds $3.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while FREL manages $1.41 B.
What sectors do the JRE and FREL ETFs invest in?
JRE leans toward sectors like Real Estate. Meanwhile, FREL focuses on Real Estate.
What are the top holdings of the JRE ETF and FREL ETF?
JRE top holdings include PROLOGIS REIT, WELLTOWER INC and EQUINIX INC COMMON STOCK REIT. FREL holds in its top three: PROLOGIS REIT, WELLTOWER INC and AMERICAN TOWER CL A REIT.
Which ETF is more diversified: JRE or FREL?
JRE holds 22 securities with 83.18% of its assets in the top 15. FREL has 130 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.79%.
Two Ways to Get Real Estate Income with ETFs
Real Estate Sector Declines on Fed Minutes
Real Estate Sector Suffers Third Weekly Loss Amid Rising Treasury Yields
Real Estate Sector Gains Momentum After Dovish Fed Comments
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
