Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JHMLvsQDEFETF Comparison
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund ETF
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund ETF (QDEF) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. JHML's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, QDEF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. JHML is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.38% for QDEF. JHML is down -0.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22M in YTD flows. QDEF performs better with 0.48% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JHML and QDEF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JHML vs QDEF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JHML QDEF | -2.77%-1.75% | -0.89%+0.32% | -0.81%+0.48% | +19.54%+19.16% | +67.83%+71.29% | +66.97%+80.66% |
| Flows | JHML QDEF | +$20M+$2M | +$26M+$4M | +$22M+$4M | -$17M+$26M | -$38M-$6M | +$30M-$181M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JHML QDEF | +11.52%+9.47% | +17.54%+14.78% | +14.24%+12.11% | +16.32%+13.98% |
| Max drawdown | JHML QDEF | -4.36%-3.51% | -13.37%-11.62% | -18.02%-14.47% | -23.44%-21.30% |
| Max drawdown duration | JHML QDEF | 31d31d | 45d46d | 127d191d | 708d566d |
JHML | QDEF | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:59 PM | $79.14 | $81.33 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $80.37 | $82.13 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JHML | QDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JHML | QDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $79.14 | $81.33 |
| 1D performance | -1.54% | -0.97% |
| AuM | $1.05 B | $497.91 M |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.38% |
JHML | QDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | John Hancock Investments | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index |
| N° of holdings | 712 | 123 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2015 | December 14, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JHML and QDEF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, JHML is down -0.81% year-to-date (YTD), while QDEF has returned 0.48%. That puts QDEF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JHML or QDEF?
Year-to-date, the JHML ETF saw +$22M in flows, compared to +$4M for QDEF.
Which ETF is more volatile: JHML or QDEF?
Over the past year, JHML had a volatility of 17.54%, while QDEF experienced 14.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: JHML or QDEF?
As of March 12, 2026, JHML holds $1.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while QDEF manages $497.91 M.
What sectors do the JHML and QDEF ETFs invest in?
JHML leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, QDEF focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the JHML ETF and QDEF ETF?
JHML top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QDEF holds in its top three: APPLE, NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: JHML or QDEF?
JHML holds 773 securities with 27.75% of its assets in the top 15. QDEF has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.64%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
