JHMLvsQDEFETF Comparison
VS
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive ETF (QDEF) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. JHML is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.4% for QDEF. JHML is up 13.2% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. QDEF performs better with 14.3% YTD performance, and -$531K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JHML and QDEF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
JHML vs QDEF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JHML QDEF | +0.95%+2.53% | +1.58%+3.71% | +13.20%+14.30% | +14.84%+15.33% | +81.88%+82.50% | +64.81%+80.92% |
| Flows | JHML QDEF | --$2M | -$7M-$6M | -$3M-$531K | -$949K+$7M | -$32M+$16M | -$33M-$96M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JHML QDEF | +9.80%+7.86% | +11.93%+9.60% | +14.18%+11.88% | +16.39%+13.88% |
| Max drawdown | JHML QDEF | -3.95%-2.82% | -7.93%-6.99% | -18.02%-14.47% | -23.44%-21.30% |
| Max drawdown duration | JHML QDEF | 78d56d | 63d66d | 127d191d | 708d566d |
Trading data
JHML | QDEF | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $89.88 | $90.66 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $91.27 | $91.54 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
JHML | QDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
JHML | QDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $89.88 | $90.66 |
| 1D performance | -1.52% | -0.96% |
| AuM | $1.17 B | $556.07 M |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
JHML | QDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | John Hancock Investments | Northern Trust |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index |
| N° of holdings | 755 | 153 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2015 | December 14, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
JHML
USA
96.61%
Other
3.39%
QDEF
USA
97.51%
Other
2.49%
Sectors
JHML
Technology
35.24%
Finance
16.02%
Healthcare
10.16%
Industrials
10.13%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.66%
Other
19.79%
QDEF
Technology
41.95%
Finance
13.38%
Healthcare
10.95%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.85%
Other
24.87%
Diversification
JHML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.4%
QDEF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.08%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
JHML
Apple, Inc.
4.30%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.12%
Microsoft Corp.
3.56%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.96%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.54%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.15%
Broadcom Inc.
1.69%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.54%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.16%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.07%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.06%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.92%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.80%
Johnson & Johnson
0.77%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.75%
QDEF
Apple, Inc.
9.10%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.38%
Microsoft Corp.
4.59%
Johnson & Johnson
2.89%
Broadcom Inc.
2.75%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.41%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.11%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.02%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.92%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.88%
KLA Corp.
1.81%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.68%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.61%
Lam Research Corp.
1.54%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
1.37%
Frequently asked questions about JHML and QDEF
How have the JHML and QDEF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, JHML is up 13.2% year-to-date (YTD), while QDEF has returned 14.3%. That puts QDEF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JHML or QDEF?
Year-to-date, the JHML ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$531K for QDEF.
Which ETF is more volatile: JHML or QDEF?
Over the past year, JHML had a volatility of 11.93%, while QDEF experienced 9.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: JHML or QDEF?
As of October 30, 2026, JHML holds $1.17 B in assets under management (AUM), while QDEF manages $556.07 M.
What sectors do the JHML and QDEF ETFs invest in?
JHML leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, QDEF focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the JHML ETF and QDEF ETF?
JHML top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. QDEF holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: JHML or QDEF?
JHML holds 763 securities with 29.4% of its assets in the top 15. QDEF has 154 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.08%.
Advertisement
Latest news about JHML & QDEF
Advertisement
Advertisement
