Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JHMLvsDFACETF Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) is part of the US All Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. JHML is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.17% for DFAC. JHML is down -0.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22M in YTD flows. DFAC performs better with 0.86% YTD performance, and +$869M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JHML and DFAC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JHML vs DFAC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JHML DFAC | -2.77%-3.37% | -0.89%-0.37% | -0.81%+0.86% | +19.54%+22.96% | +67.83%+70.11% | +66.97%+67.42% |
| Flows | JHML DFAC | +$20M+$435M | +$26M+$1.07B | +$22M+$869M | -$17M+$3.33B | -$38M+$10.56B | +$30M+$15.90B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JHML DFAC | +11.52%+11.83% | +17.54%+18.39% | +14.24%+15.30% | +16.32%+17.34% |
| Max drawdown | JHML DFAC | -4.36%-3.91% | -13.37%-14.07% | -18.02%-20.02% | -23.44%-23.21% |
| Max drawdown duration | JHML DFAC | 31d30d | 45d46d | 127d216d | 708d707d |
JHML | DFAC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $78.82 | $39.07 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $79.14 | $39.26 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JHML | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JHML | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $78.82 | $39.07 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.48% |
| AuM | $1.05 B | $41.31 B |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.17% |
JHML | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | John Hancock Investments | Dimensional |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 712 | 2225 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2015 | October 4, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JHML and DFAC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, JHML is down -0.81% year-to-date (YTD), while DFAC has returned 0.86%. That puts DFAC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JHML or DFAC?
Year-to-date, the JHML ETF saw +$22M in flows, compared to +$869M for DFAC.
Which ETF is more volatile: JHML or DFAC?
Over the past year, JHML had a volatility of 17.54%, while DFAC experienced 18.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: JHML or DFAC?
As of March 12, 2026, JHML holds $1.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while DFAC manages $41.31 B.
What sectors do the JHML and DFAC ETFs invest in?
JHML leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, DFAC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the JHML ETF and DFAC ETF?
JHML top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. DFAC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: JHML or DFAC?
JHML holds 773 securities with 27.75% of its assets in the top 15. DFAC has 2294 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.22%.
Active ETFs See Strong Interest with Managers like Dimensional Fund Advisors Leading the Way
The Most Popular Actively Managed ETFs of 2023
Active ETFs gaining prominence
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.