Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JGRWvsPCLGETF Comparison
Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. JGRW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. In contrast, PCLG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. JGRW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.57%, versus 0.69% for PCLG. JGRW is down -4.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. PCLG performs worse with -10.86% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JGRW and PCLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JGRW vs PCLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JGRW PCLG | -1.42%-0.66% | -4.27%-11.17% | -4.59%-10.86% | +0.92%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | JGRW PCLG | --$10M | +$8M+$3M | +$2M+$4M | +$30M- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JGRW PCLG | +11.32%+16.56% | +15.66%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | JGRW PCLG | -6.65%-15.05% | -10.43%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | JGRW PCLG | 58d56d | 37dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
JGRW | PCLG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.61 | $21.78 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $25.76 | $21.75 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
JGRW | PCLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.61 | $21.78 |
| 1D performance | -0.60% | +0.16% |
| AuM | $119.18 M | $101.79 M |
| E/R | 0.57% | 0.69% |
JGRW | PCLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Jensen Investment Management | Polen Capital |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 26 | 24 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 12, 2024 | September 29, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JGRW and PCLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, JGRW is down -4.59% year-to-date (YTD), while PCLG has lost -10.86%. That puts JGRW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JGRW or PCLG?
Year-to-date, the JGRW ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$4M for PCLG.
Which ETF is bigger: JGRW or PCLG?
As of March 10, 2026, JGRW holds $119.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while PCLG manages $101.79 M.
What sectors do the JGRW and PCLG ETFs invest in?
JGRW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. Meanwhile, PCLG focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the JGRW ETF and PCLG ETF?
JGRW top holdings include MICROSOFT-T, ALPHABET INC-CL and APPLE. PCLG holds in its top three: AMAZON.COM INC, MICROSOFT-T and LILLY.
Which ETF is more diversified: JGRW or PCLG?
JGRW holds 26 securities with 76.52% of its assets in the top 15. PCLG has 24 securities and a top 15 weight of 76.11%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
